My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 030911
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2011
>
PC 030911
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
2/2/2012 10:52:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
3/9/2011
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4. Demolition in Ray Street/Spring Street Neighborhood. This prohibits the demolition <br />of primary buildings in the Ray Street/Spring Street Neighborhood unless such <br />buildings are considered to be unsafe or dangerous and if no other feasible means <br />of rehabilitation can be achieved. <br /> <br /> Mr. Dolan stated that there is a map associated with this policy which was <br />generated when policy was put in place. He indicated that the policy does not <br />affect the entire neighborhood but only a small, specific geographic area which is <br />one of the original subdivisions in the City and includes some nice older homes. <br /> <br />5. New Buildings. Mr. Dolan stated that despite a recent example of the problem with <br />the Harvey home, he does not consider this a huge issue. He noted that there has <br />not been a lot of activity in this area, but staff finds fitting new homes into existing, <br />older neighborhood a challenge. <br /> <br />6. Additions and Other Modifications. This section states that additions and <br />modifications to buildings over 50 years old should match the original building in <br />terms of architectural style and exterior design elements. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that adding on to a historic home presents a struggle regarding to <br />what extent the addition should match the existing building. He noted that people <br />have different thoughts about this, and some have misinterpreted the National and <br />State policies that drive a lot of these decisions. He indicated, for example, that <br />there is a National and State policy that suggests that one should never mimic <br />something old in a new building or in an addition; the idea is that one should be <br />able to distinguish between the periods. He noted that there are people who want <br />to add on to an old building and think that they should try to make the addition look <br />exactly like the old building. He stated that true historic preservationists do not <br />believe that, but it should not be an exaggerated implementation of that principle <br />either. He pointed out that some think that the Firehouse Art Center is an <br />exaggerated implementation of that principle. <br /> <br />Mr. Dolan stated that he thinks it is all right to make the addition dramatically <br />different; the Plan has policies that require additions to stay within the general style <br />of the building, but this can be achieved without making the addition exactly like <br />the existing building. He noted that the purpose appears to contradict itself when it <br />talks about matching the building yet being different; however, sometimes there <br />are easy solutions, and in most cases, it is a relatively easy design fix. <br /> <br />7. Existing On-Site Street Frontage Homes. This section provides that future <br />residential development should generally provide for the preservation and <br />rehabilitation of existing on-site street frontage homes which exceed 50 years in <br />age or which otherwise, substantially contributes to the small town <br />the neighborhood in terms of architecture and scale. <br /> <br />PLANNING COMMISSION REGULAR MINUTES, March 9, 2011 Page 8 of 24 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.