24 - Laserfiche WebLink

Resolution No. 96-89 Page 2 WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed and considered the Initiative Ordinances attached to this Resolution; and WHEREAS, Section 9280 of the Elections Code specifies that the City Council may direct the City Clerk to transmit an initiative to the City Attorney to prepare an impartial analysis of the measure; and WHEREAS, Section 9282 of the Elections Code specifies that the legislative body, or any member or members of the legislative body authorized by that body, may file a written argumatt for any city measure; and WHEREAS, Section 9285 of the Elections Code sets forth the procedures for rebuttal NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: That two City Council sponsored i nitiatives, one regarding the Urban Growth Boundary and one regarding the rnaxitnum number of housing unite at buildout, be placed on the November 5, 1996 General Election, and the Initiative Ordinances are attached to this resolution. The measures shall be designated by letter by the Alameda County Registry Section Z: The ballot language shall be as follows: As to the Urban+ Growth Boun Initia+i+ Shall the Pleasanton Urban Growth Boundary Initiative be adopted to require voter approval of all but minor changes to the City's Urban Growth Yes No As to the Residential Buildout Initiative Shall the Pleasanton Residential Buildout Initiative be adopted which provides that the maximum number of residential units at buildout shall not exceed 29,000 units and cannot be changed except by a vote of the people? Yes No