Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES <br />CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />SPECIAL CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />June 26, 2008 <br />CALL TO ORDER <br />Vice Mayor Thorne called the special meeting to order at 6:30 pm on behalf of Mayor <br />Hosterman who arrived late. Vice Mayor Thorne led the Pledge of Allegiance. <br />Roll Call <br />Present: Mayor Hosterman (arrived at 7:00 p.m.), Vice Mayor Thorne, and Councilmembers <br />Cook-Kallio, McGovern and Sullivan <br />Absent: None <br />Vice Mayor Thorne discussed the special meeting stating the only item to be presented would <br />be the analysis of the impacts and effects of the Save Pleasanton Hills and Housing Cap <br />Initiative and other hillside regulation issues. <br />Receive Report Analyzing the Impacts and Effects of the Initiative and Consider <br />Implementation Option <br />City Manager Fialho said the requisite number of signatures had been gathered to qualify the <br />Save Pleasanton's Hills and Housing Cap Initiative for the ballot. The Council was presented on <br />May 20th with three statutory options to consider; 1) adopt the Initiative as submitted; 2) place <br />the Initiative on the ballot for November 2008; or 3) request an analysis of the impacts and the <br />effects of the initiative otherwise known as a 9212 Report within 30 days. <br />At the May 20`h meeting, the City Council took action on option number 3. In addition to what is <br />allowed by law to be analyzed, the Council also requested that staff respond to questions posed <br />by the Council and the community at the May 20 meeting. In addition, council discussed <br />whether to have aCouncil-sponsored initiative on the November election. <br />As a result of further Council discussion on June 17, Council will need to decide whether to <br />place its own initiative on the ballot or to simply do nothing and allow the citizen's Initiative to <br />move forward on its own merits. If the Council directs staff to prepare a Council sponsored <br />measure, the proposed ballot question would be brought forward to the Council on July 15, <br />which is the same date the proposed ballot question and schedule for submittal of arguments <br />pro and con for the citizens Initiative will be made. <br />Assistant City Attorney Larissa Seto discussed the 9212 Report. She stated that at the May 20 <br />meeting, the City Council asked staff to return with a 9212 Elections Code Report to analyze the <br />impacts and effects of the Save Pleasanton Hills and Housing Cap Initiative. The report <br />analyzes several elements, including how the Initiative could impact land use in the community, <br />as well as the impact on and the consistency with the City's General Plan and any related <br />specific plans. Staff also looked at what the potential impact would be to businesses and <br />employment in the community, and analyzed impacts to vacant land, transportation, open <br />space, and agricultural issues. All questions were answered which had been raised at the May <br />20'" meeting regarding other hillside regulations and the report ends with a fiscal analysis of the <br />citizen's Initiative. <br />