Laserfiche WebLink
PLANNING COMMISSION <br />Pleasanton, California <br />RESOLUTION N0. 1009 <br />A resolution of the Planning Commission of the City <br />of Pleasanton recommending to the City Council the <br />adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 70-3, filed <br />by the Planning Commission. <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Pleasanton <br />has considered a General Plan Amendment to <br />reclassify the ultimate improvements for Foothill <br />Road between Bernal Avenue and Verona Road, <br />WHEREAS, said Commission has held a public hearing on this <br />amendment and has examined the pertinent maps, <br />drawings and documents and finds that the following <br />conditions do exist: <br />1. That the proposed amendment will not be <br />contrary to the spirit and intent of the General <br />Plan, <br />2. That the proposed amendment is in the public <br />interest and general welfare, <br />3. That the proposed amendment creates a more <br />equitable condition for the community than now <br />prevails. <br />4 That upon inspection of the traffic studies <br />produced by Livingston 6 Blayney, it has been <br />established that a two-lane road will suffice for <br />the area in question, <br />NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission of the City of <br />Pleasanton hereby recommends to the City Council the <br />adoption of an ordinance reclassifying said alignment <br />from a four-lane thoroughfare to a two-lane <br />thoroughfare; subject to the following conditions: <br />1) That the area south of Bernal Avenue to Verona <br />Road be established as a scenic, rural, two-lane <br />thoroughfare, with the possibility of left-turn <br />median lanes if needed only; 2) That the area south <br />of West Las Positas Boulevard to Bernal Avenue, if <br />at all possible, be also maintained under the same <br />status; 3) That said precise amendment not be <br />officially adopted by the City Council until such <br />time as a specific recommendation has been forwarded <br />by the Department of Planning and Public Works <br />relative to a physical design for the right-of-way <br />in question. <br />