My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN050575
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
1970-1979
>
1975
>
CCMIN050575
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/26/2010 10:47:59 AM
Creation date
11/16/1999 11:53:25 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
MINUTES <br /> of <br /> THE MEETING <br /> of <br /> THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br /> May 5, 1975 <br /> <br /> The City Council met in Adjourned Regular Session at 8:00 P.M., at the Veterans <br /> Memorial Building, to discuss the Economic Element of the General Plan. <br /> <br /> Councilmembers Herlihy, LeClaire, McLain, Philcox, and Mayor Kinney were <br /> present. Mr. Edgar, City Manager, Mr. Bowling, Director of Housing and Community <br /> Development, Mr. Glenn, Planning Aide, Mr. Sooby, Director of Engineering Services, <br /> Mr. Caporusso, Recreation Superintendent, Mr. Walker, Assistant to the City Manager, <br /> were present. Mr. Bob Arnold and Mr. Steve Levy, Consultants, Institute of Regional <br /> and Urban Studies, were also present. <br /> <br /> INTRODUCTORY REMARKS <br /> Mayor Kinney stated the purpose of this meeting was to acquaint the public with <br /> the Economic Element of the General Plan. <br /> <br /> STAFF PRESENTATION <br /> BackSround on Current General Plan Revision <br /> Mr. Edgar stated the Economic Analysis was the latest element of the General <br /> Plan, and would be incorporated with the other elements into a single document for <br /> review at a later date. <br /> <br /> FISCAL ANALYSIS OF PLEASANTON GENERAL PLAN <br /> Mr. Steve Levy, Consultant, Institute of Regional and Urban Studies, reviewed <br /> the major findings of the Economic Analysis, as follows: <br /> <br />1. Under the Baseline or No Growth case operating budget expenditures are <br /> expected to increase slightly faster than revenues between 1975-80. The <br /> General Fund - Recreation budget deficit is projected to reach $367,000 <br /> in 1979-80, which is equal to 8% of projected revenues. <br /> <br />2. Increased revenues from 3,000 additional households between 1975-80 will <br /> cover costs for non-salary expenditures and allow an approximately 24% <br /> increase in personnel with a 32% increase in households and 28% increase <br /> in population. <br /> <br />3. Trends in revenues and expenditures for the General Fund - Recreation <br /> budget beyond 1980 are projected to be similar to the trends for 1975-80. <br /> The deficit under the Baseline or No Growth case is projected to equal <br /> approximately 15% of total revenue. <br /> <br />4. There will be a deficit of approximately $2-3 million for financing a <br /> projected $3.7 to $5.5 million of capital projects in the 1975-80 period. <br /> <br />5. Approximately $51 million (1975 prices) in capital projects have been <br /> projected for the period beyond 1980. Street projects account for <br /> $38 million of the total. There is no way currently to finance the <br /> projected $30 million shortage in revenues required for street projects. <br /> <br />6. There will be no differences in the fiscal impacts on school districts <br /> from alternative growth rates under present and future school financing <br /> legislation. <br /> <br />City Operating Cost Projections <br /> School District Operatin~ C~..st Projections <br />City Capital Cost Projections <br /> Mr, Levy presented Charts displaying projected figures as follows: <br /> <br />1.Projections of General Fund - Recreation Budget for Baseline (no growth) <br /> Case for period 1974-75 to 1979-80. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.