Laserfiche WebLink
147 <br /> <br /> MINUTES <br /> of <br /> THE MEETING <br /> of <br /> THE CITY COUNCIL <br /> <br /> June 2, 1982 <br /> <br /> CALL TO ORDER <br /> Mayor Robert Butler called the Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council <br /> to order at 7:30 P.M. <br /> <br />ROLL CALL <br /> The roll call is recorded as follows: Councilmembers Brandes, Mercer, Mohr, <br />Wood, and Mayor Butler were present. Mr. Walker, CityManager, and Mr. Swift, <br />Acting City Attorney, were present. <br /> <br /> EXECUTIVE SESSION <br /> Mayor Butler recessed the meeting at 7:35 P.M., to an Executive Session to <br />discuss personnel. <br /> <br /> Mayor Butler reconvened the meeting at 10:00 P.M. <br /> <br />REPORTS OF THE CITY MANAGER <br />Consideration of modification of term for RAP Exemption for Joe Madden's Shadow <br />Creek Pro3ect <br /> Mr. Walker presented his report (SR 82:194) dated May 28, 1982, regarding this <br />matter. <br /> <br /> Mayor Butler asked if the Council had any questions concerning the report. He <br />then asked if anyone in the audience would like to speak on the report. <br /> <br /> Mrs. Donna Graves, Pleasanton Housing Authority Commissioner, speaking on behalf <br />of the Housing Authority, disapproved the modification of the term of the RAP exemp- <br />tion. Mrs. Graves also objected to the waiver of the conditions personally, stating <br />that Mr. Madden and Mr. Adams took the risks involved when they accepted the exemp- <br />tion and that the free enterprise system should be allowed to work. <br /> <br /> Mr. Madden summarized why the changes were needed and stated the modifications <br />were slight and all of the units in his project would still be priced below $100,000 <br />and, therefore, more affordable than anything else in the community. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mohr asked Mr. Madden if the reason for the modification was that <br />interest rates had remained high and, therefore, lower income families could not <br />qualify for loans. Mr. Madden gave several examples of what payments would be on <br />different prices units at different interest rates, showing the minimum yearly in- <br />come necessary to qualify, and indicating the difficulty of qualifying for even the <br />least expensive unit in the project. He concluded that the original plan to offer <br />co-ownership plans to lower-income households is economically infeasible due to the <br />high monthly payments necessary to cover the high interest rate mortgages available, <br />even at "bought down" rates. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Mercer reviewed the history of how the conditions on the project <br />were finally determined. He stated that he agreed with the staff recommendation <br />and thanked Mr. Madden and Mr. Adams for doing a good job of bringing lower cost <br />housing units to Pleasanton. <br /> <br /> <br />