Laserfiche WebLink
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2007-25 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING VESTING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP 7813, <br />THE APPLICATION OF CHARLES AUSTIN AND SCOTT AUSTIN <br /> <br />WHEREAS, Charles Austin and Scott Austin have applied for Vesting Tentative Tract <br />Map approval to subdivide an approximately 30.15-acre property located <br />at 3459 Old Foothill Road into eight single-family custom home lots, four <br />parcels that will be transferred to adjoining property owners, and with the <br />remaining land dedicated to the City of Pleasanton for open space <br />purposes; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, The subdivision map is submitted in conformance to the previously <br />approved applications, PGPA-11 and PUD-58; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-LDR and AG (Planned Unit Development – <br />Low Density Residential and Agriculture and Grazing) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of May 23, 2007, the Planning <br />Commission considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and <br />recommendations of the City staff concerning this application; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the environmental review for this project is covered by the Initial Study/ <br />Mitigated Negative Declaration for PUD-58 and PGPA-11, approved by <br />the City Council on October 17, 2006; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />1. The proposed vesting tentative subdivision map is consistent with <br />the Pleasanton General Plan. <br /> <br />The PUD Development Plan that the proposed vesting tentative <br />subdivision map is based on was found by the City Council to be <br />consistent with PGPA-11, the amendment to the Pleasanton General Plan <br />that changed the land use designation to Low Density Residential <br />(< 2 du/ac) on eight acres, with a maximum of eight units, and Agriculture <br />and Grazing on the remaining 22 acres. The subdivision map and its <br />improvements are consistent with these land use designations. Therefore, <br />this finding can be made. <br /> <br />