My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 2006-11
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2006
>
PC 2006-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/27/2007 4:50:07 PM
Creation date
8/28/2006 9:08:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/29/2006
DOCUMENT NO
PC-2006-11
DOCUMENT NAME
PAP-91 (PADR-1465)
NOTES
JANISEN/(CHOY)
NOTES 3
FLOOR ADDITIONS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PL EA SANTON <br />ALAMEDA CO[JN TY, CALIFORNIA <br />RESOLUTION NO_ PC-2006-1 7 <br />RESOLUTION DF_N PING THE APPEAL OF JAMF_S AND 'TAMI _TANISEN, THEREBY <br />UPHOLDING THE ZONING ADMINISTRAT'OR'S APPRO VAI. OF AN <br />ADMINISTRATIVH DESIGN REVIEW, AS FILED UNDER CASE PAP-97 (PAD R-1465) <br />WHEREAS, James and Tatni Janiscn have appealed the Zoning Administrator's approval of <br />Case PADR-1465., the application of David Choy and Wendy Sonznzcr for <br />administrative design review approval to construct an approximately <br />395-square-foot first-floor addition and an approximately ] 60-square-foot <br />second-floor addition to the rear and side of the existing residence located at <br />3431 Windsor Court- and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is R-1-6,500 (Single-Family Residenti alb District; and <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of March 29, 2006, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the <br />City staff concerning this application; and <br />WHEREAS, projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act ~CEQA~; and <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed prof ect is consistent with <br />the appearance of the existing buildings in the area. <br />NOW, "THEREFORE, "THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF PLEA SAN'1.'ON <br />RESU LVBS THE FOLLOWING: <br />Section I _ Denies Case PAP-91, the appeal of James and Tami Janisen, thereby upholding <br />the Toning Administrator's approval of Case PADR-1465, the application of <br />David Choy and Wendy Somirler for ad~riinistrative design review approval to <br />construct an approximately 395-square-foot first-floor addition at~d an <br />approximately 160-square-foot second-floor addition to the rear and side of the <br />existing residence located at 3431 Windsor Court, subject to the conditions shown <br />in Exhibit B, attached hereto and made part of this case by reference. <br />Sectioi~ 2. This resolution shall become effective ] 5 days after its passage and adoption <br />~uiless appealed prior to that time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.