GHAD 06-007 - Laserfiche WebLink

CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AS BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAUREL CREEK ESTATES GEOLOGICAL HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT RESOLUTION NO. 06-007 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING ASSESSMENTS WITHIN THE LAUREL CREEK ESTATES GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT AND ORDERING LEVY AND COLLECTION THEREOF WHEREAS, on November 18, 1997, the City Council of the City of Pleasanton adopted Resolution No. 97-135, approving the formation of a geologic hazard abatement district ("GHAD") for the Laurel Creek Estates project area and appointing the City Council as the Board of Directors for the GHAD; and WHEREAS, on June 6, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Laurel Creek Estates GHAD adopted Resolution No. 06-003 declaring the Board's intention to order that the costs and expenses of maintaining and operating the GHAD improvements shall be assessed against the property within the GHAD benefited thereby. Said resolution further declared the Board's intention to assess against the property within the GHAD, for the 2006-2007 fiscal year and for subsequent fiscal years, those amounts set forth in the report prepared by the General Manager of the GHAD pursuant to the Public Resources Code Section 26651. Said report is attached as Exhibit "A" to said Resolution. Said resolution further fixed July 18, 2006, at 6:55 p.m. as the time for the hearing of any protests to the proposed assessments; and further directed the City Clerk to mail notice of said hearing pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 26652; NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF THE LAUREL CREEK ESTATES GEOLOGIC HAZARD ABATEMENT DISTRICT RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: Section 1: A public hearing before the Board for the hearing of any protests to the proposed assessments within the Laurel Creek Estates GHAD was held on July 18,2006, at 6:55 p.m. Notice of said hearing was given in accordance with the requirements of Public Resources Code Section 26652. Section 2: At the hearing, the Board heard and considered any and all protests to the proposed assessments. Thereafter, the Board closed the hearing.