My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 2005-08
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2005
>
PC 2005-08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/30/2007 4:28:17 PM
Creation date
3/1/2006 4:33:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/9/2005
DOCUMENT NO
PC 2005-08
DOCUMENT NAME
PUD-42
NOTES
BACH AND LAMB
NOTES 3
4 LOT DEVELOPMENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
YLANNINCi COMMIS SIUN CITY OP' YLEASANTC~N <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, C7ALIFORNIA <br />RESOLLJ"LION NO. PC-2005-OS <br />R1~;SOLUTION RECOMMENDING APPROVAL OF THE APPLICATION OF <br />EARL BACH, KAREN BACK, ED LAMB, SR_, AND ED LAMB, JR_ FOR PL7D <br />DEVELOPMEN"f PLAN APPROVAL, AS PILED UNDER CASE PUD-42 <br />WHEREAS, Earl Back, Karen Bach, lid Lanib, Sr., and Ed Lamb, Jr_ have applied for PLJD <br />development plan approval to allow afour-lot development plan for three new <br />homes fora 1 _84-acre site located at 446 Sycatrtore Road in the North Sycamore <br />Specific Ylan Area; and <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PL7D-LDR (Planned Unit Development -Low Density <br />Residential District; and <br />WHEREAS, at its duly noticed public hearing of February 9, 2005, the Planning Commission <br />considered -all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recorniriendations of the <br />City staff concerning the PUI.7 development plan; and <br />WHEREAS, an Environmental Impact Report ~EIR~ for the North Sycamore Sped Fic Plan <br />Area was prepared and ccrti£cd by the City Council in February ] 99 7 , and the <br />California Environmental Quality Act specifies that individual residential <br />development projects that are prepared pursuant to the requirements of an adopted <br />specific plan for which an EIR has been prepared and certified are exempt from <br />additional environmental review; acid <br />WHEREAS, the Planning CJommission determined that the proposed development plan is <br />appropri etc for the site, would be consi stcnt with other scantly approved prc~jecis <br />in the area, and would not alter the natural topographical features of the area_ <br />WIIEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings for the PUD development <br />plan= <br />The plan is in the best interests of the public health, safety, and general <br />welfare_ <br />The proposed development, as conditioned, iricets all applicable City standards <br />concerning public health, safety, and welfare, e. g., vehicle access, geologic <br />hazards (new dcvclopiricnt not within a. special studies zone, and flood hazards. <br />Ful] public and private streets and water, storm, and sanitary sewer lines are <br />present to serve the proposed lots on this site. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.