My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
ORD 0411
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
ORDINANCES
>
0401 - 0500
>
ORD 0411
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2004 12:42:16 PM
Creation date
10/20/1999 11:14:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
ORDINANCES
DOCUMENT NO
ORD 0411
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL, CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> ORDINANCE NO. 411 <br /> <br /> AN ORDINANCE APPROVING THE ANNEXATION OF <br /> CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY, DESIGNATED <br /> AS ANNEXATION NO. 40, KAISER QUARRY ANNEX <br /> '~", TO THE CITY OF PLEASANTON. <br /> <br /> The City Council does hereby ordain as follows: <br /> <br /> SECTION 1. The City Council does hereby make the following <br /> findings: (a) On April 12, 1965, the Council of the City of <br /> Pleasanton did pass and adopt Resolution No. 65-65 giving notice of <br /> the proposal to annex certain uninhabited territory to the City <br /> of Pleasanton. Said territory was designated as Annexation No. 40, <br /> Kaiser Quarry Annex '~", and did describe the boundaries of the <br /> territory proposed to be annexed. <br /> <br /> (b) Said Resolution No. 65-65 contained a notice of the <br />time and place for the Council of the City of Pleasanton to hear <br />protests made by any person owning real property within the <br />territory proposed to be annexed. Said time of said hearing was <br />not less than fifteen nor more than sixty days from the date of <br />passage of the Resolution. <br /> <br /> (c) On May 24, 1965, at the hour of 8:00 P.M. in the <br />Council Chambers in the Pleasanton Women's Club Building, Southwest <br />corner of Vineyard and Regalia Avenues of the City of Pleasanton, <br />County of Alameda, State of California, the said City Council did <br />conduct a public hearing and pass upon protests made, there being <br />none. By Resolution No. 65-88 the City Council determined that <br /> <br />~rotests had not been made by the owners of one-half of the value <br />}f the privately owned territory proposed to be annexed as shown <br />}y the last equalized assessment roll, nor by public owners of <br />one-half of the value of the publicly owned territory proposed to <br />be annexed as determined by said legislative body. <br /> <br /> (d) Said territory is contiguous to the City of Pleasan- <br />iton, and is uninhabited territory in the County of Alameda. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.