2 - Laserfiche WebLink

TME CITY OF Planning Commission —NpY I �. ;III Agenda Report /1 i IN .Ir July 24, 2019 Item SUBJECT: P19-0092 APPLICANT/ PROPERTY OWNER: Nicole Raymer PURPOSE: Application for Design Review approval to construct an approximately 4,300-square-foot, single-story residence with an approximately 825-square-foot attached garage LOCATION: 6 Winding Oaks Drive (Lot 6) GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential and Open Space-Public Health and Safety SPECIFIC PLAN: Vineyard Avenue Corridor ZONING: Planned Unit Development— Hillside Residential/Open Space (PUD-HR/OS) District EXHIBITS: A. Draft Resolution and Conditions of Approval B. Project Plans, View Simulation, and Color and Material Board dated "Received June 3, 2019" C. Location and Notification Map D. Estates on Oak Ridge Architectural Design Guidelines (previously distributed and available on-line at http://www.cityofpleasantonca.gov/EstatesDesignGuidelines) STAFF RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve Design Review (DR) Case No. P19-0092 based on the Findings and subject to the draft Conditions of Approval listed in Exhibit A. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The proposed project is to construct an approximately 4,300-square-foot, single-story residence with an approximately 825-square-foot attached garage on an approximately 3.3-acre lot within the Estates on Oak Ridge Subdivision. New homes within the subdivision require the Planning Commission to review and consider a design review application. As such, this Design Review application is before the Planning Commission for consideration. As proposed and conditioned, staff recommends that the Planning Commission find the project to be consistent with the applicable regulations and approve the application. , Brown and Ritter NOES: None ABSENT: Commissioners Balch, O'Connor and Pace Planning Commission Minutes Page 25 of 27 June 26, 2019 back with updates to approve it and move forward to the City Council. Mr. Beaudin stated the Planning Commission could take this action if ready tonight or continue the item to the next meeting. Commissioner Ritter suggested seeing the changes, summarized as a workshop and returned when there is the fourth Commissioner present for final recommendation. Chair Allen stated it could be continued but did not feel there was controversy on the items in terms of how they would be written up. She also cited the fact that a new Planning Commissioner was not involved with the Task Force and this meeting and it may cause a "restart" issue. Planning Commission Minutes Page 24 of 27 June 26, 2019 umber of steps, but it requires a very collaborative effort and team approach, and City Council has a challenging task to reconcile multiple demands. The idea to have a Task Force or smaller group to work on the parking issue means people need to come to it with the willingness to look at things beyond just adding supply two years from now through a parking structure. Planning Commission Minutes Page 23 of 27 June 26, 2019 presented, stating the PDA Vitality Committee began meeting and red-lining the 2002 DSP in 2013. They provided it to staff in 2014 and have been awaiting this process. She said although there have been wins, there Planning Commission Minutes Page 6 of 27 June 26, 2019