Laserfiche WebLink
RESOLUTION NO. 19~9 ~ <br /> <br /> ~ORIALIZING THE CONGRESS OF TH~ UNI'£~u STATE~ <br /> OF A~,~ICA IN TH~ MATTER OF THE 00NSTRUCTION OF <br /> A SECOND TRAFfiC CROSSING BE~EEN SAN FP~ANCI~CO <br /> .....AND THE AREA COM~JONLY KNOWN AS.~ THE "EAST BAY." <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Joint Army and Navy Board is now making studies for the <br />location of a proposed new bridge across San Francisco Bay, pursuant to House <br /> <br />Resolution No. 529, 79th Congress~ Second Session; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Toll Bridge Authority of the State of California is <br /> <br />making a similar study under authorization of its Resolution; and <br /> <br /> ~HEREAS, these reports will be submitted to the Congress of the <br /> <br />United States; <br /> <br /> NG% THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE Co~noil of the <br />Town of Pleasanton <br />~ that the Congress of the United States be, and <br /> <br />it is, hereby memorialized on this subject and respectfully requested in its <br /> <br />study of the aforementioned reports, to give due weight to the following <br /> <br />considerations, to wit: <br /> <br />That the volume of traffic over the present Bay Bridge is such <br />as to make plainly evident the immediate need for a new <br />structure. <br /> <br />That the location of the present Bay Bridge does not adequately <br />serve the larger portion of the population of Alameda County. <br />Out of a total County population of 743,000, the areas east of <br />Lake ~erritt and to the southern County line~ including East <br />Oakland and the Cities of Alameda, San Leandro and Hayward, have <br />a population of 391,271. To the traffic emanating from this area, <br />must be added that which originates in the cities and towns along <br />Highway 50 and that part of Highway 99 from Stockton to Bakers- <br />field <br /> <br />3 - That the a~proaches to the presently existing structure are not <br /> adequate to properly care for the traffic of the Bridge <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />That the location of the proposed Bridge should be to the south <br />of the present structure and so situated that it might adequately <br />serve the areas hereinbefore described. <br /> <br />That the construction of a new Bridge in close proximity to the <br />present Bridge would add greatly to the existing confusion in, <br />and difficulties of, handling traffic in these areas. <br /> <br />m <br /> <br />That of all the Bridge plans submitted for study, the ~'~alsh Plan, <br />providing for a bridgehead at the foot of Army Street in San <br />Francisco and a double bridgehead in Alameda - one to serve West <br />Oakland and points north, and one to serve Southern Alameda <br />County - would most adequately serve this area. <br /> <br /> <br />