08 ATTACHMENTS - Laserfiche WebLink

THE CITY OF 13 1 WM I ••n IN1NI -.II ;11 pLEASANTON® Date: May 1, 2009 To: Mayor and Members of.the City Council From: Office of the City Attorney Subject: Supplemental Agenda Report Concerning the Appeal of the Planning Commission's Decision to Deny the Tentative Map Application for the Vineyard Villa Mobilchomc Park Summary On the Council's regular agenda for May 5, 2009 is an agenda report concerning an appeal of the Planning Commission's decision to deny the tentative map application that would allow the Vineyard Villa Mohilehome Park to be converted to "residential ownership For the reasons expressed in that agenda report, staff recommends that the appeal be granted and therefore the application, with conditions, be approved. The purpose of this supplemental report is to recommend that Council, in addition to approving the application, take action to: add a condition to extend the term of the current Rent Stabilization Agreement to 2025; support legislation that would strengthen local control over mobilehome conversions; and support other public entities' litigation efforts to exercise more local control over mobilehome conversions. 1. Extending the term of the current Rent Stabilization Agreement. In 2007 the City Council approved a Rent Stabilization Agreement with the owner of the Vineyard Villa Mobilehomc Park. In general terms, it limits the park owner to raise rents annually to a cost of living index, but with a floor of 2% and a ceiling of 5 The Agreement has a Live year term but also provides that if the Council approves the residential conversion, the term would be extended for live additional years, i.c., through December 2017. Under existing state law concerning residential conversions, once Tots begin to he sold, local rent control regulations are abrogated in favor of state law provisions. Those provisions provide that as to households that qualify as lower income households (currently, two person households earning less than $53,000 annually would quality as lower income), the park owner could raise rents no more than the average of cost of living increases over the previous four years. hence, lower income households that choose not to purchase their Tots will continue to have rent control protection even after conversion. For households that do not qualify as lower income households (and choose not to purchase their lots), the state law provisions allow the park owner to raise space rents to "market but over a five year period. Here, the owner has agreed that if the application is approved, he will not begin selling the lots for at least 10 years; through at least 2017, rents would continue to be controlled through the current Rent