My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
08
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2010
>
020210
>
08
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/28/2010 4:43:42 PM
Creation date
1/28/2010 2:12:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/2/2010
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
08
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
THE CITY OF �l <br /> CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT v <br /> pL£ASANTONo <br /> February 2, 2010 <br /> Community Development <br /> Planning Division <br /> TITLE: PUD -75 /PGPA -14 /PSPA -3 CONSIDER AN APPLICATION TO AMEND <br /> THE GENERAL PLAN AND THE HAPPY VALLEY SPECIFIC PLAN; <br /> AND FOR PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT REZONING AND <br /> DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR ADDITIONAL LOTS OVER <br /> THE ALLOTTED NUMBER FOR THE 6.13 -ACRE PARCEL LOCATED <br /> AT 1157 HAPPY VALLEY ROAD <br /> APPLICANT: Don Babbitt Heartwood Communities <br /> PROPERTY OWNER: Robert Wentworth <br /> GENERAL PLAN: Low Density Residential -One dwelling unit per 2 gross acres <br /> SPECIFIC PLAN: Happy Valley Specific Plan: Semi -Rural Density Residential <br /> ZONING: PUD -SRDR (Planned Unit Development- Semi -Rural Density <br /> Residential) District <br /> SUMMARY <br /> The applicant is proposing a development plan and design guidelines for an <br /> approximately 6.13 -acre site to establish six single family home lots; three lots more <br /> than what is allotted for the site. The applicant originally requested seven lots, however, <br /> has since reconsidered the density and has made plan revisions based on feedback <br /> received from four separate Planning Commission meetings over the last two and half <br /> years. Although the applicant does not have a favorable recommendation from staff <br /> and the Planning Commission, the applicant would like the Council to consider the <br /> request of amending the General Plan and Happy Valley Specific Plan for an increase <br /> in density for the subject site. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION <br /> On October 28, 2009, the Planning Commission recommended denial of amending the <br /> General Plan and Happy Valley Specific Plan, and PUD development plan application <br /> for increasing the density from the maximum three lots to six. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Find that the proposed PUD development plan, Attachment 2; Exhibit B, and <br /> design guidelines, Attachment 3; Exhibit C, are not consistent with the General <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.