My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 2000-17
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2000
>
PC 2000-17
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/14/2013 11:24:16 AM
Creation date
8/15/2001 4:49:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/23/2000
DOCUMENT NO
PC 2000-17
DOCUMENT NAME
UP-99-06/Z-99-58
NOTES
Paul & Vicki Larson
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
PLANNING COMMISSION CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. PC-2000-17 <br /> <br />RESOLUTION APPROVING THE APPLICATION OF PAUL AND VICKI LARSON FOR <br />CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND DESIGN REVIEW APPROVAL, AS FILED UNDER CASE <br />UP-99-06/Z-99-58 <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />Paul and Vicki Larson have applied for conditional use permit and design review <br />approval to allow a first- and second-floor addition totaling approximately 2,800 <br />square feet to the existing residence located at 3711 Trenery Drive; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, zoning for the property is PUD-LDR (Planned Unit Development - Low Density <br /> Residential) District; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, <br /> <br />at its duly noticed public heating of February 23, 2000, the Planning Commission <br />considered all public testimony, relevant exhibits, and recommendations of the City staff <br />concerning this application; and <br /> <br />projects of this nature are categorically exempt from the requirements of the <br />California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA); therefore, no environmental <br />document was prepared for this project; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the Planning Commission made the following findings: <br /> <br />The proposed location of the conditional use is in accordance with <br />the objectives of the zoning ordinance and the purpose of the <br />district in which the site is located. <br /> <br />The request to construct an addition conforms with the objectives and purposes of <br />the Zoning Ordinance. While there are no established site development standards for the <br />lot, the proposed addition conforms to the R-I-40,000 zoning district standards. The <br />proposal would maintain the Queen Anne style of the original house built in 1914. The <br />addition, would be toward the rear, thus minimizing its impact from Trenery Drive and <br />properties across Trenery Drive. The addition has large setbacks from the property lines <br />and from homes on adjacent lots. <br /> <br />The proposed location of the conditional use and the conditions under which it <br />would be operated or maintained will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, <br />or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. <br /> <br />Due to the project's design and location, the project would not impact properties in the <br />vicinity. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.