My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 81392
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1981
>
RES 81392
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2013 2:50:52 PM
Creation date
3/2/2000 7:38:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
11/10/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
WHEREAS, <br /> <br />WHE tEAS, <br /> <br />I!1 <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br />ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br />RESOLUTION NO. 80-74 <br /> <br />A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNTY-WIDE METHOD FOR <br />REDISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FOLLOWING <br />ANNEXATION OR CERTAIN OTHER JURISDICTIONAL CHANGES. <br /> <br />'Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code (AB-8) <br />provides, among other things, that no local agency <br />jurisdictional change {Q.ther than a city incorporation <br />or a formation of a district) can be completed without <br />the agencies affected by s~ch change first having agreed <br />upon a redistribution of property tax revenue from <br />such area between and among said agencies; and <br /> <br />the Alameda County ~ayors'.Conference on March 12, 1980, <br />reviewed and endorsed as equitable a policy proposal <br />submitted by the Alameda County Administrator which, <br />in pertinent part, calls for a redistribution of pro- <br />perty tax revenues currently derived from an unincorpo- <br />rated territory which is proposed to be annexed to a <br />city, in the following manner: <br /> <br />In all annexations involving developed or developing <br />residential territory, as well as mixed residential/ <br />commercial areas and vacant or underdeveloped in- <br />dustrially zoned areas, the City would automatically <br />be entitled to receive an allocation of the County's <br />general fund computed property tax revenue from that <br />area equal to the City's/County existing allocation <br />percentage ratio within its corporate limits; <br /> <br />Should a substantial portion of any annexation include <br />a developed commercial area, the County will under- <br />take an analysis of nonproperty tax revenues vs. <br />County service costs in determining what portion, if <br />any, of the. County allocation is redistributed; and <br /> <br />In the event that a City assumes full responsibility <br />for a service or services presently provided by a <br />separate County taxing agency or special district within <br />a territory proposed to be annexed, pursuant to Revenue <br />and Taxation Code Sec..99~(b), the County will endeavor <br />to transfer to the City the entire computed property <br />tax revenue presently allocated to ~uch County agency <br />or district from said area. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.