RES 83501 - Laserfiche WebLink

No Approval of Project Alternative. f.1 Finding. The No Approval of Project Alternative is infeasible. f.2 Fact. As explained in the EIR, adoption of the No Approval of Project Alternative would result in either (i) the development of the Property pursuant to its present zoning and parcel map or (ii) no further development of the Property. Development of the Property pursuant to its present zoning and parcel map would have an equivalent impact. The streets and infrastruc- ture to support the Project are already substan- tially completed and channels have been im- proved. The Property lies at the intersection of 1-580 and 1-680, an area appropriate for urban infill. Twenty percent (20%) of the Pro- ject has already been approved or built. The No Approval of Project Alternative is economically infeasible because of the problems created by an inadequate fiscal base to support projected demand for capital improvements and community services for the community as a whole even with- out development of the Project. Liens resulting from assessments to finance the infrastructure mandate development of commercial and industrial uses at proposed densities. Partial Approval Alternative. g.1 Finding. The Partial Approval Alternative is infeasible. Fact. The Partial Approval Alternative has similar impacts to the Reduced Intensity of Development Alternative. See Section XII.e.2. Mixed Use Alternative. h.1 Finding. The Mixed Use Alternative is infeasible. Fact. The Project is located near the junction of two freeways. Noise, air and traffic impacts from the freeways, major arterials and in-tract collector streets would have a negative impact on the quality of life expected for a residen- tial development. In addition, the Project is located in the middle of an area planned for in- dustrial and commercial development and would be 23.