My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 83163
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
RES 83163
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/19/2012 12:01:56 PM
Creation date
2/2/2000 12:56:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
4/26/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and landscaping easements, together with landscaping <br /> irrigation; and all other improvements and <br /> appurtenances necessary for'a complete scheme of <br /> public improvements for Dublin Canyon Road, from the <br /> Pleasanton City Limits easterly to and including the <br /> intersection with Foothill Road, including a portion <br /> of Canyon Way, together with the acquisition of all <br /> necessary interests in real property. <br /> <br /> The Resolution of Intention was later amended. <br /> <br /> 3. The Engineer of Work filed the report as directed, <br />and the City Council called a hearing on the report as required <br />by Section 10301 of the Streets and Highways Code. Notice of <br />the hearing was given by publication, by street posting and by <br />mailing to affected property owners, all according to the <br />Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. Affidavits of publication, <br />posting and mailing were filed with the City Clerk. <br /> <br /> 4. The date for which notice was given to receive <br />construction bids was extended one week to April 20, 1983. An <br />addendum was issued to the construction specifications and this <br />Council hereby ratifies said extension of time for receipt of <br />construction bids. <br /> <br /> 5o At the time and place for which notice was given, <br />the City Council conducted a public hearing and gave every <br />interested pers6n an opportunity to ~bject to the proposed <br />improvement, the extent of the assessment district, or the <br />proposed assessment. Following the hearing, at the direction of <br />the City Council, the Engineer of Work filed an amended report. <br /> <br /> 6. The Council finds that written protests against <br />the proposed improvement have not been made by owners <br />representing more than one-half of the area of the land to be <br />assessed for the improvement. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.