My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 83086
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1983
>
RES 83086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/15/2012 3:37:48 PM
Creation date
2/2/2000 12:00:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/8/1983
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
INTRODUCTION <br /> <br />A brief survey of records storage facilities at the municipal building <br />of the city of Pleasanton was made on March l, 1982 by the principal <br />consultant of Records Systems Associates, Inc. (RSA). <br /> <br />The purpose of this survey was to observe current record handling pro- <br />cedures and to determine the volume of active and inactive records now <br />kept in the various areas. <br /> <br />Evaluation of the findings by RSA resulted in this report which contains <br />recommendations and a proposal for implementation of basic segments of a <br />comprehensive Records Management Program. <br /> <br />If implemented, this program would ultimately bring efficient records <br />management practices to all operating departments of the city. <br /> <br />RESULTS OF SURVEY <br /> <br />Visits to several areas now used for storage of inactive records showed <br />an estimated total volume of 526 cubic feet. This is the equivalent of <br />15,780 lbs. or approximately 7.9 tons. <br /> <br />Most of these records (346 cubic feet or about 5 tons) were kept in a <br />building at the corporation yard. Containers of all types ranging from <br />steel files and transfer files to odd size cardboard boxes were used to <br />store records. Most containers had been placed on non-standard steel <br />shelves and others were stacked on the floor. A systematic arrangement <br />or an index to the box contents was apparently not avaiiable. <br /> <br />The second area visited was a telephone equipment room at City Hall. It <br />contained an estimated 77 cubic feet of records, some in steel files and <br />others in cardboard containers. <br /> <br />The third area inspected was in the Engineering and Planning Department. <br />It contained an estimated 205 cubic feet of which about 103 cubic feet <br />(or50%) were deemed inactive. All records in this area were in steel <br />files or standard cardboard boxes. <br /> <br />The appearance of all areas visited indicated a lack of policy for the <br />control and coordination of the city's records. <br /> <br />RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />The responsibility for all record-keeping in municipal government rests <br />with the mayor and council. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.