RES 83055 - Laserfiche WebLink

WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, WHEREAS, CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON AL~-~EDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA RESOLUTION NO. 83-55 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON CONCERNING THE HISTORY AND MEANING OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON the meaning of the Growth Management Element of the Pleasanton General Plan is questioned in a legal action entitled Citizens for Balanced Growth v. City of Pleasanton and the City Council of Pleasanton, Alameda Superior Court Number H-84827-2; and Judge Raymond Marsh on January 3, 1983 issued a Notice of Intended Decision in case Number H-84827-2 which said in Dart: "The Respondents' action in approving the Hacienda Project was taken in the absence of evidence that the project was consistent with the City's general plan"; and Judge Marsh on January 26, 1983, at a hearing on a request to enjoin construction of buildings and improvements previously approved for Hacienda Business Park announced that he would deny the requested injunction but also stated that the project as approved "is inconsistent with the City's General Plan"; and we are informed that Judge Marsh did not have available to him the legislative history of the Pleasanton General Plan before reaching his tentative conclusion, and, in particular, was not presented with the background of the Growth Management Element; and the City Council of the City of Pleasanton on June 8, 1982 made a finding that Hacienda Business Park's development plan was consistent with the General Plan of the City of Pleasanton; and the City Council has directed the City Attorney to review the history and language of the General Plan in view of the Court's statements; and the Court and the parties to the suit have focused on the meaning of Goal 1 and Policy 3 of the Growth Management Element; and -1-