My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
051909
>
12 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/20/2009 12:43:53 PM
Creation date
5/14/2009 1:16:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
5/19/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
12 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
87
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Minutes <br />Planning Commissio <br />January 9, 1985 <br />PUD- 84 21, EVH Partnership <br />Application of EVH Partnership and the Roman Catholic Bishop of <br />Oakland for PUD zoning and development plan approval of a 262 <br />unit multi family residential development and related facilities <br />on an approximately 13 acre site located immediately southwest of <br />Bernal Avenue (extension) and the Southern Pacific right -of way. <br />The property consists of approximately 8 acres currently within <br />the City limits and approximately 5 acres currently outside of <br />the City limits for which this action shall constitute a <br />prezoning. The Planning Commission may recommend any action on <br />this matter consistent with the General Plan. A negative <br />declaration of environmental impacts will also be considered. <br />Mr. Harris presented the staff report recommend approval of the <br />project. He reviewed the past history of previous application <br />for the property. Further the City received today a letter from <br />the San Francisco City and County Water Department asking that <br />this matter be postponed. Mr. Howell has been in contact with <br />Mr. Jensen of SFWD today and Mr. Tandy Carter is present to <br />represent SFWD. <br />Commissioner Lindsey asked about the possible ingress and egress <br />to Sunol Boulevard. Mr. warnick indicated that the staff <br />addressed this matter in their report and doesn't feel that at <br />this time it is necessary and that it can be done at a later <br />time. Commissioner Lindsey asked why it is not important now to <br />have it completed. Mr. Warnick explained that the railroad <br />tracks is in the way and will probably remain for another one to <br />two years. The project does not have access to Sunol at this <br />time. The applicant is in agreement that if it appears necessary <br />at a later time, they will be willing to accomplish the <br />connection. <br />Vice Chairman Wilson asked if Bernal Avenue isn't built out how <br />the connection would be made. Mr. Warnick stated that the new <br />street will be built up passed the Police Department. Access <br />would now be through New Bernal Avenue. Commissioner Innes asked <br />5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.