Laserfiche WebLink
VI. ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />The proposal is exempt from environmental review under Section 15332, In -Fill <br />Development Projects, of Article 19, Categorical Exemptions, of the California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA): <br />"Class 32 is characterized as in -fill development meeting the conditions <br />described in this section. (a) The project is consistent with the applicable <br />general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as <br />with applicable zoning designation and regulations. (b) The proposed <br />development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five <br />acres substantially surrounded by urban uses. (c) The project site has no <br />value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. (d) Approval <br />of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, <br />noise, air quality, or water quality. (e) The site can be adequately served <br />by all required utilities and public services." <br />VII. PUD DEVELOPMENT PLAN FINDINGS <br />The Pleasanton Municipal Code sets forth the purposes of the Planned Unit <br />Development (PUD) District and the considerations to be addressed in reviewing a PUD <br />development plan proposal and proposed modification(s) of an approved development <br />plan. The Planning Commission must make the following findings that the proposed <br />modification of the previous PUD development plan conforms to the purposes of the <br />PUD District, before making its recommendation. <br />1. Whether the proposed development plan modification is in the best <br />interests of the public health, safety, and general welfare: <br />The proposed project will provide 10 units of moderate income rental housing <br />and 2 units of low- income rental housing for a 30 -year time period. The <br />development as designed and conditioned meets all applicable City standards <br />concerning public health, safety, and welfare, e.g., vehicle access, and <br />geologic hazards (new development not within a special studies zone). <br />Staff, therefore, believes that this finding can be made. <br />2. Whether the proposed development plan modification is compatible with <br />previously developed properties located in the vicinity of the plan: <br />The proposed buildings are located in a manner consistent with City <br />standards for adequate emergency vehicle access, and are designed and <br />sited to be integrated with the existing buildings of this development. <br />Staff, therefore, believes that this finding can be made. <br />Item 6.c., PUDM- 84- 21 -04M <br />Page 10 of 12 March 25, 2009 <br />