Laserfiche WebLink
The property owner shall file a report on the economic impact of conversion <br />upon the residents and shall make a copy of the report available to each <br />resident at least 15 days prior to the hearing. <br />In converting the Park to resident ownership, Section 66427.5 requires the property <br />owner to avoid the economic displacement of all non-purchasing residents. This is <br />accomplished in a number of different ways: offering each resident the option to <br />purchase his/her lot (i. e., condominium unit) or continuing residency as a renter,' and <br />as to non-purchasing residents, complying with State law as to how rents are to be <br />calculated, depending on the income level of the resident household. <br />Here, the Park owner has sent out to each resident a Tenant Impact Report (TIR), a <br />copy of which is attached as Attachment 11. The TIR (the terms of which were <br />negotiated with City staff provides that the sales of the lots/units will not occur for at <br />least ten years, that the terms of the Rent Stabilization Agreement will remain in <br />effect through at least 2017, that no one will be evicted upon conversion (ten years <br />hence), that residents will have the option to purchase their lot/unit; and that rents, <br />after conversion, will be in accordance with State law. Staff therefore recommends <br />that this finding can also be made. <br />Potential Additional Affordability Restrictions <br />Staff observes that the conversion of the Park to residential ownership has both <br />positives and negatives. The conversion would provide home-ownership opportunities <br />at an affordability level not found elsewhere in the City. Ownership would also provide <br />more control over Park improvements to the residents. <br />The primary disadvantage of the conversion would be the potential loss of long-term <br />affordable rental opportunities in town. Secondly, those residents who do not choose to <br />or are not able to purchase their space, and are not low income so that their rents would <br />be controlled by State law, would be subject to increased rents to market rate over a <br />five-year period. To offset these potential impacts to non-low-income renters, staff has <br />requested that the Park owner consider extending similar affordability opportunities to <br />this subset of Park residents. At the time this report was prepared, staff had not yet <br />received a response to this request. <br />ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br />The conversion of an existing rental mobile home park to a residential subdivision, <br />cooperative, or condominium for mobile homes is statutorily exempt [California <br />Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15282 (e)]. Therefore, no <br />environmental documentation accompanies this report. <br />CONCLUSION <br />There are clearly legal issues for which no definitive answer can be provided at this <br />time. Some of these issues are subject to pending litigation in other jurisdictions, but it <br />will take some time for these issues to be litigated to the point where there is appellate <br />Page 5 of 6 <br />