Laserfiche WebLink
to own land in the mobile home park, but the legislature realized it was difficult for them <br />to get financing to purchase the entire park. He continued that In the 1980's, the <br />legislature set up a system to encourage park owners to subdivide their parks and make <br />them available to residents for purchase with pro rata ownership interest in the common <br />areas. He added that the legislature also stated that those residents who do not want to <br />buy can live in the park for as long as they wish. <br />Mr. Close stated that the legislature also set up rules regarding rental rates in the park <br />in that rents cannot go above the CPI for low-income residents. He continued that for <br />non-low-income residents, State law provides that rent would go to market rate over a <br />four-year period. He noted that low income for a family of two is $53,000 annually, and <br />for a family of four, it would be $56,250. <br />Mr. Close stated that the purpose of the conversion is to create affordable for-purchase <br />housing. He noted that the rules are very specific and added that it could be frustrating <br />because this is a subdivision but not a regular one. He indicated that to encourage park <br />owners to convert, the legislature indicated that as long as the rules that have been set <br />forth are complied with, the City must approve the conversion. <br />With respect to whether or not a resident who continues to rent would have to pay <br />homeowner association (HOA) dues, Mr. Close said the answer is no. He explained <br />that if a resident continued to stay in the park as a renter, he or she would pay rent to <br />the owner, who would pay the dues to the HOA, much like in a condominium <br />association. He added that over time, tenants will eventually control the operation of the <br />park. <br />Mr. Close indicated that there would be no change whatsoever in the park for at least <br />ten years or longer. He stated that he was not sure why aten-year period was <br />suggested but believes it was something the owner preferred. <br />Suzie Forbath, Gilchrist & Rutter, stated that the State recognizes that affordable <br />housing is different for people of different incomes, and this is the reason why the <br />increase in rent is spread gradually over afour-year period. She noted that the State is <br />trying to create affordable for-purchase housing, which is a scarce commodity. She <br />added that part of the reason why it is more of a form of affordable housing than what <br />they have today is because while rents may be limited; there is no limit on the cost of <br />the homes they must buy to rent the space. <br />Ms. Forbath indicated that mobile homes do not qualify for real estate loans as they are <br />deemed personal property, but upon conversion, the current residents who decide they <br />want to purchase can take their old loans and roll them into a real estate loan with the <br />property and qualify for lower interest rates. She noted that this would reduce the cost <br />of what they were paying on their loans and would become affordable for them. <br />Ms. Forbath stated that the State also wanted to encourage lower-income residents to <br />be able to purchase their lots, and recognizing i1 may be difficult for them to qualify for <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES. February 25, 2009 Page 6 of 19 <br />