My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 09265
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
RES 09265
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/27/2009 12:50:46 PM
Creation date
3/27/2009 12:49:47 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/24/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
RES 09265
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The No Project Alternative is also infeasible because it is inconsistent with the <br />objectives of the proposed project, which include, among others, guiding the <br />development of the Staples Ranch site with a mix of economically beneficial uses, <br />retaining existing auto sales businesses within the City, providing senior continuing care <br />amenities, and providing community recreational facilities. <br />Existing Specific Plan Alternative <br />Description <br />Under the Existing Specific Plan Alternative, the land uses that were approved as part <br />of the 1989 Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan (1989 Specific Plan) for the Project Area <br />would be developed. Of the 124 acres that comprise the Staples Ranch site, 1.5 acres <br />that lie within the City of Pleasanton would remain zoned as PUD-Medium Density <br />Residential, but this area would be developed with a portion of the community park. No <br />residential units would be constructed under this alternative. The remaining 122.5 acres <br />of undeveloped land in unincorporated Alameda County would be annexed into the City. <br />The land use designations for this area, according to the 1989 Specific Plan, include <br />Service Commercial and Light Industrial, Retail and Service Commercial, and <br />Community Park. <br />This alternative differs from the proposed project in that it would not include the senior <br />continuing care community, it does not specify the development of an auto mall, and <br />does not include the joint neighborhood park/storm water detention facility. <br />Finding: Infeasible <br />As indicated in the EIR, the environmental impacts of the Existing Specific Plan <br />Alternative would have slightly greater impacts than the proposed project. This <br />alternative would result in substantially more traffic than projected for the proposed <br />project and cause additional significant impacts not identified for the proposed project. <br />In particular: <br />Air: This alternative would result in considerably more vehicular trips than the <br />proposed project (roughly twice as much), and exceed the BAAQMD <br />thresholds for criteria air pollutants. The resultant emissions would be a <br />significant and unavoidable air quality impact, with air emissions <br />substantially greater than predicted for the proposed project. <br />Hazards: Because the Existing Specific Plan Alternative would have the potential to <br />accommodate more retail, service commercial, and light industrial uses, <br />which typically involve greater amounts of hazardous materials and waste, <br />than the proposed project, there may be a slightly greater potential for an <br />accidental release of hazardous materials. Nevertheless, this greater <br />potential for accidental releases would be mitigable following the same <br />procedures, protocols, and regulations that were identified for the <br />proposed project. <br />Stoneridge Drive Specific Plan Amendment and Staples Ranch Project <br />Environmental Impact Report Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations Page 5 of 47 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.