PC 012809 - Laserfiche WebLink

approval. Commissioner Fox asked that it simply exist as a placeholderforeach Commissioner to rate as high, medium, or low. Commissioner Narum inquired whether or not PRZ-25 and PRZ-41, Planned Unit Development Processing Requirements, go hand-in-hand. Acting Chair Olson inquired if they were related at all. Ms. Decker replied that PRZ-25 is related to amending Chapter 18.44, which is specific to uses that are allowed and uses that require CUP's in Commercial zones. She noted that the Code amendment is specific only to straight-zoned properties and does not affect PUD's. With respect to PRZ-41, Ms. Decker explained that this is a very small portion of the Code's Section 18.68 and relates to some inconsistencies that need to be fixed. Commissioner Narum inquired which between PRZ-25 and PRZ-41 needed more work or was more outdated. Ms. Decker replied that PRZ-41 was prepared to come before the Planning Commission and had been continued due to other reasons. Mr. Dolan stated that PRZ-25 is already on the Council's list of Priorities as one of the Customer Service Review Team's (CSRT} recommendations and on which a lot of work has already been done. He explained, however, that the City Manager has instructed staff to proceed on the CSRT recommendations that do not require a policy decision. He noted that there are many process items that the Planning staff can do to improve the way the Division operates before moving them to the City Council for discussion and decisions. He indicated that it is much more involved than PRZ-41, which is a simple change relating to whether or not a tentative map can be brought forward at the same time as a PUD. Acting Chair Olson inquired whether or not, given their momentum, PRZ-25 and PRZ-41 could be removed from the list. The Commissioners agreed to exclude them from the shorter priority list. Acting Chair Olson then asked if both would require policy decisions. Mr. Dolan confirmed that they would and added that PRZ-25 will happen after some administrative fixes are accomplished and that PRZ-41 is likely to happen at some point as well. Mr. Dolan further stated that the staff report for the Planning Commission has been written but that it would require Council consideration and decision as well. He added, however, that the City Manager believed there were other priorities that needed to be on the agenda before this small clean-up. Commissioner Blank stated that the criteria he used is something that works but perhaps not well gets less priority than something that is broken. Acting Chair Olson agreed that this was reasonable and inquired what items were broken. Commissioner O'Connor stated that he believed PRZ-39, Personal Wireless Service Facilities, was broken and needed to be cleaned up to meet with State legislation. He inquired if, in the event that it is not considered a priority, its non-compliance with PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 28, 2009 Page 5 of 10