My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 011409
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
PC 011409
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:39:22 PM
Creation date
3/20/2009 2:48:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
1/14/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Blank moved to find that the project would not have a significant <br />effect on the environment and that the proposed Planned Unit Development <br />plan is consistent with the General Plan and the PUD ordinance; to make the <br />PUD findings listed in the staff report; and to recommend approval of the <br />Negative Declaration and Case PUD-77 to the City Council, subject to the <br />Conditions of Approval as listed in Exhibit B of the staff report, with the <br />modifications that the Condition No. 40 include the standard language for the <br />installation of an automatic sprinklersystem and the addition of the standard <br />conditions forthe green building requirement and the provision for future <br />photovoltaic system. <br />Ms. Decker noted that the Commission also discussed the deletion of Condition <br />No. 14 regarding project phasing, the modification of Condition No. 31 relative to <br />construction on Saturdays, and the modification of Condition No. 51 to clarify the <br />Zone 7 requirements should the existing well be removed. <br />Commissioner Olson seconded the motion. <br />Commissioner Narum noted some typographical errors that she requested be <br />corrected: (1) Condition No. 11, change the word "note" on the next to the last line <br />to "not". (2) Conditions Nos. 20 and 21, change the word "following" in "the applicant <br />shall strictly following..." to "follow." She added that she would support the project <br />noting that she did not think about the argument that four of the lots could be turned <br />into one-acre lots by moving the boundary to the west and getting into the drainage, <br />which she did not support doing. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Narum, Olson, and Pearce. <br />NOES: Commissioner Fox. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: None. <br />Resolutions Nos. PC-2009-02 recommending approval of the Negative <br />Declaration and PC-2009-03 recommending approval of Case PUD-77 were <br />entered and adopted as motioned and amended. <br />Chair Pearce called for aten-minute break at 8:20 p.m., and thereafter reconvened <br />the special meeting at 8:30 p.m. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 14, 2009 Page 15 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.