Laserfiche WebLink
communicates with all parents in person as well as via send-home notes and email. Ms. <br />Shackelford stressed that she is a teacher, not a daycare worker and believes that she has a <br />unique opportunity to continue her career while also staying home with her own children during <br />the day. She asked the Council to vote in support of LIL so that it may continue to offer the <br />same high level of academic support and learning opportunities that it does now. <br />Dr. Elliott Alber said that he moved to Pleasanton specifically for the opportunities provided by <br />LIL. His family does not speak Chinese, but he believes fluency in several foreign languages to <br />be a necessity in the modern world. He stressed that academic achievement is paramount to <br />both him and LIL, and cautioned the Council that a vote against this relocation could pose a <br />great loss to the local community. <br />Rachel Tu reiterated the previous comments and noted that the program welcomes students of <br />all ethnicities, strengthens the community and should be embraced. <br />Ms. Fox stressed that she is not questioning the quality of LIL's program but believes licensing <br />in very important. A licensed program requires that the director has either a Commission of <br />Teacher Credentialing Child Development Site Supervisor Permit or an equivalent accreditation <br />issued by the Department of Child and Social Services. She believes it is important to set <br />standards whereby the State monitors and maintains the safety and conduct of those facilities <br />and noted LIL was found to be operating in excess of its CUP last fall. She cited additional <br />operational similarities between LIL and other programs, all of which are licensed, and said that <br />failure to require such here would make it the only church operating an unlicensed afterschool <br />program in Pleasanton. <br />Ms. Zheng said that the City's primary concerns seem to revolve around the background checks <br />and appropriate safety training of her staff. She explained that all staff has cleared the first level <br />background check and that as the City does not have a supporting fingerprinting process in <br />place, the latter may take some additional time. First-aid and CPR certification course have <br />been scheduled. In response to Ms. Fox, she stated that repeated conversations with the State <br />Department have reiterated that this sort of exemption is being granted throughout the state. <br />Councilmember McGovern noted that at the Planning Commission hearing Mr. MacDonald said <br />the applicant was willing to obtain a childcare license and asked if they were still willing to do so. <br />She said that she is concerned that the State grants these exemptions so that it does not have <br />to follow through with supervision of the programs and believes it is due to the budget crisis. <br />Ms. Zheng deferred to Mr. MacDonald who confirmed that they will do so if the City requires it. <br />He cautioned that it would create a zoning issue due to the requirement of a private and <br />exclusive outdoor play area. While the applicant is willing to fence off a portion of the church's <br />parking lot, it seems ridiculous to do so considering the ample square footage available inside <br />and the proximity to Hart Middle School's play area. He also cautioned that the State has made <br />it very clear that it considers this an afterschool program, does not want to have to issue a <br />license for it, and tends to feel burdened when cities needlessly throw programs into their <br />process. <br />The public hearing was closed. <br />Vice-Mayor Cook-Kallio noted that the applicant has complied with the substance of the law <br />which requires a background check, CPR training, and provisions for fresh air activities and <br />asked if the only remaining issue with regards to licensure would be the zoning requirements. <br />City Council Minutes Page 6 of 19 February 17, 2009 <br />