My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 121008
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 121008
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:58 PM
Creation date
3/10/2009 9:59:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
12/10/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
35
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
At this point, Chair Blank noted that there were still a number of speakers for the <br />hearing and inquired if any of the items should be continued. Commissioner Fox <br />suggested continuing Item 6.d., PUD-75lPSPA-3, Robert Wentworth, and Item 6.e., <br />PAP-130, Phil Blank and Anne Fox ~PDRW-13, Katie Belmonte). Ms. Decker <br />recommended that the Commission continue Item 6.d. and Item 6.e. to January 14, <br />2009. <br />Ms. Seto noted that Item 6.e. should be opened because it is an appeal item and the <br />City is required to hear it within a 40-day period. Chair Blank asked if there was <br />anyone in the audience who would not be able to attend the January 14t" hearing for <br />Item 6.d or item 6.e. An audience member noted that she would like to speak under <br />Item 6.e., and Chair Blank noted that per the Commission Handbook, the <br />Commission is not required to open and hear a new item after 11:00 p.m. <br />Commissioner Fox moved to continue Item 6.d., PUD-751 PSPA-3, Robert <br />Wentworth to January 14, 2009. <br />Commissioner Narum seconded the motion. <br />ROLL CALL VOTE: <br />AYES: Commissioners Blank, Fox, Narum, O'Connor, and Pearce. <br />NOES: None. <br />ABSTAIN: None. <br />RECUSED: None. <br />ABSENT: Commissioner Olson. <br />The public hearing for PCUP-224, Little Ivy League School, was then resumed. <br />Larry Lai stated that he moved to Pleasanton because of its schools and that his <br />five-year-old son has been attending Ivy League for about six months. He stated <br />that he believed it is a wonderful Chinese program where his son learned to read <br />about 200 Chinese words. He indicated that he wants his son to be able to speak <br />Mandarin and that he believes the weekend schools do not provide enough Chinese <br />training. He indicated that he felt Ivy League offers a unique program and that the <br />course material is superior in that it incorporates classic Chinese poetry, literature <br />and culture. He asked the Commission to approve the request. <br />Winnie Zhang stated that her daughter started attending Little Ivy League in 2005, <br />noting that prior to this, she had the option to attend other schools, but found that <br />they were not as comprehensive as Little Ivy League. She noted that Ivy League <br />has tutoring, structured programs, Chinese, and homework time and that her <br />daughter has made significant progress. She asked the Commission to approve the <br />school. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 10, 2008 Page 15 of 35 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.