My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
CCMIN020309
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2009
>
CCMIN020309
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/5/2009 8:08:18 AM
Creation date
3/5/2009 8:08:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/3/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
DOCUMENT NO
CCMIN020309
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Staff recommends that the Council adopt a Statement of Overriding Considerations for these <br />impacts. Mr. Bocian then introduced EIR consultant Rod Jeung of PBS&J. <br />Mr. Jeung provided a summary of the EIR development process and the resulting changes to <br />the project that involve emergency vehicle access, amulti-use trail, a conceptual Park Master <br />Plan, adjusted boundaries between the neighborhood park and continuing care community, and <br />modification to the Auto Mall Place/EI Charro Road intersection. <br />Mr. Jeung worked with staff to prepare responses to the 23 letters and nearly 200 verbal <br />comments submitted by the public; those responses and any revisions are included in this EIR. <br />He outlined the final steps of the EIR process pending a decision by the Council. <br />Mayor Hosterman asked Mr. Jeung to clarify the appropriate application of the EIR. She said <br />that a number of environmental groups and agencies, particularly Alameda Creek Alliance <br />(ACA), have worked hard to create opportunities for Steelhead to move up through the creek <br />and various tributaries and arroyos. She referenced a letter from ACA that identifies several <br />areas where the EIR fails to address species loss, including Steelhead. She confirmed that the <br />EIR does not particularly address this, noted that there is not yet Steelhead in this particular <br />section of the Arroyo Mocho, and asked if the EIR only addresses those issues that are <br />immediately current. <br />Mr. Jeung explained that the EIR documentation considers existing conditions, known planned <br />conditions and future conditions that are likely to occur. He acknowledged the steps being taken <br />to provide for Steelhead migration through this area but said that it would be speculative at this <br />point to determine whether that will actually happen. The EIR has, to a certain extent, <br />recognized that the installation of the two lane bridge has associated potential effects on stream <br />beds, habitat repair, and the San Joaquin spearscale. Mitigation measures have been identified <br />to protect those resources. <br />Councilmember Sullivan referenced the same ACA letter and said that there may be confusion <br />on or dispute with the mitigations already performed for the spearscale. <br />Mr. Jeung explained that when the Arroyo Mocho was realigned in 2004, the U.S. Army Core <br />Permit that was issued recognized the resulting disturbance to the San Joaquin spearscale, a <br />California Related Plant Society Category B plant. A portion of the Staples Ranch Project site <br />provided habitat for this species and the Army Corp required soil and seed collection from the <br />area prior to construction, stockpiling, and finally replanting to restore the population. Studies <br />conducted in 2003, 2005, 2006, and 2007 showed that a large population of spearscale has <br />reestablished itself along the banks of the arroyos. Mr. Jeung stated that while there may be <br />minimal disturbance to some of the relocated spearscale population, the EIR does provide some <br />mitigation measures. He noted that project disturbances are not expected to extend into <br />currently populated areas of the Arroyo Mocho. <br />Councilmember Sullivan asked and confirmed that the mitigations are primarily for those plants <br />that were or are in the Arroyo Mocho, not those that may be on the project site. He asked and <br />confirmed that there are no mitigations for the latter. <br />Stewart Cook, ACSPA, provided further explanation on the relocation of the spearscale, added <br />that they are annual plants with an ever-changing population, and noted that the arroyos are <br />currently populated by tens of thousands spearscale that were not there before. The EIR has <br />concluded that this mitigation worked very well and has essentially pre-mitigated the impacts of <br />this current project. <br />City Council Minutes Page 4 of 14 February 3, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.