My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
030309
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2009 2:41:15 PM
Creation date
2/26/2009 2:41:13 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
3/3/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The recommended actions to increase the reserve focus on that one-time transfer and move <br />those funds into the General Fund's Temporary Recession Reserve as a preventative measure <br />against any unforeseen impacts of the economy or State budget. He noted that the recently <br />identified high priority capital projects approved by the City Council are either completed or <br />under construction with budgeted funding and the $3 million being held is not programmed for <br />any specific project. The transfer would result in a reduced CIPR balance of $1.9 million but <br />would increase the Temporary Recession Reserve balance to $10.9 million. <br />Mr. Culver reviewed operating reserves, both $60.3 million in unrestricted funds and another <br />$72.5 million in restricted reserves for a combined reserve total of $132.9 million. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked and confirmed that the restricted reserves include retired <br />medical reserves that are insufficient to fund the long term debt and questioned the unfunded <br />liability. Mr. Culver stated that the last actuarial evaluation identified a range of $77-118 million, <br />depending on the interest rate earned. The actuarial evaluation is based on the assumption that <br />funds will be placed in certain types of investments with interest rates ranging from 4-8%. <br />Councilmember Sullivan referenced Page 7 of the staff report, noted that there is some <br />additional anticipated revenue due to a rate adjustment in water service that has not yet been <br />done. He commented on the dual purpose of the rate increase, as both an increase in revenues <br />and discouragement of the overuse of water, and asked if staff will be presenting an update. <br />Mr. Fialho estimated it would come before the Council in March or April. <br />Councilmember Sullivan expressed support for the strategy to divert CIPR funds in the short- <br />term. He asked what the recommended strategy is for the next two-year budget cycle. Mr. <br />Fialho explained that the budget that comes forward will incorporate afive-year cash flow that <br />will attempt to explain the strategy for a balanced budget while maintaining core service levels. <br />He added that upon adoption of the General Plan, staff will present a fiscal impact analysis that <br />will forecast expenditures over a 10-15 year planning horizon and match projected revenues <br />that would be derived through build-out. <br />Councilmember McGovern referred to Lions Wayside Park, its relationship with the Firehouse <br />Arts Center and confirmed that only its design, not construction, has been funded. She noted <br />that the CIPR balance will decrease to $1.9 million following the $3 million transfer and asked if <br />this year could still realize the development of that section closest to the arts center. <br />Mr. Fialho agreed and detailed the three phases of the project and their funding sources. He <br />added that there is an expected transfer of $2.5 into the CIPR next year. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked for clarification on the CIPR deposits, and Mr. Fialho <br />explained that the annual General Fund contribution to the CIP may be reduced from $5 to $2.5 <br />million in the next two-year budget. He added there is both opportunity and capacity for funds to <br />support the Lions Wayside Park project if the City Council chooses to make it a priority. <br />Councilmember McGovern asked and confirmed that recreation fee revenues are lower than <br />anticipated and asked staff to follow that closely. She expressed concern that the recession is <br />affecting families within the community to a point where they cannot participate in the City's <br />recreational offerings. She thanked Mr. Culver for his work and suggested that staff publish the <br />City's economic status in the Pleasanton Weekly so that they may see the value of the City's <br />efforts. She offered several suggestions for the upcoming two-year budget including analyzing <br />and perhaps re-evaluating property tax to fall in line with current home values and studying <br />City Council Minutes Page 5 of 11 January 20, 2009 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.