04 ATTACHMENT 10 - Laserfiche WebLink

Mary Lei Campbell From: Mary Lu Campbell Sent: Tuesday, F=ebruary 03, 009 2:29 P T: 0. Cc: Nelson Fialho; Maria Hoey; Cheryl Cook -t allio; Cindy McGovern; .Jennifer Hosterman; .Jerry Thorne; Matt Sullivan Subject: FEE: N6 ON STONERID E DRIVE EXTENSION February 3, 2009 Dear Nis. Messick -Cass: Thank you for your message expressing your opposition to the extension of Stoneridge Drive. Be assured a copy of your message is being provided to the Mayor and Members of the City Council so they may have the benefit of your opinion. Mary Lu Campbell Executive Assistant City of Pleasanton P.O. Box 520 Pleasanton, CA 94566 -0802 -----Original Message - - - -� From: terry messick 1 Sent: Tuesday, February o, 2009 11:21 A To: Mayor and City Council List Subject: NO ON STOI EI ID E DRIVE EXTENSION Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, I oppose the extension of Stoneridge [give for the following reasons: 1 one neighborhood should not be forced to take the blunt of traffic problems in the Tri- Valley. We Do NOT yet have a Regional Road-Map where the local jurisdictions have all agreed on what infrastructure improvement should be made and in what order. The design of Staples Punch Park is deeply flawed and should be completely re- worked. 4 Air quality will be even worse if we open Stoneridge give to El Charro. There will be a major LOSS of QUALITY of LIFE for anyone who lies along Stoneridge Drive. There are two schools and a church on Stoneridge Drive. 6) The noise, traffic and crime withing Pleasanton as a whole will certainly go up if Stoneridge Drive is extended to El harro. Finally, it is NOT WISE for Pleasanton to step forward to help the Regional ional traffic need by opening up Stoneridge aDrive to El harrol ! l l Thank you for your consideration of this very important matter. Mrs. Terry Messick-Cass (Pleasanton Resident for 13 gears)