My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
021709
>
09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/12/2009 4:40:27 PM
Creation date
2/11/2009 1:15:38 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/17/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
09
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Affordable Housing <br />The City's Inclusionary Zoning Ordinance (IZO) requires new single-family residential <br />projects of fifteen units or more to provide at least twenty percent (20%) of the dwelling <br />units as affordable units to very low, low, and/or moderate income households. For <br />multi-family projects of fifteen units or more, the IZO requires at least fifteen percent <br />(15%) affordable units. <br />The Affordable Housing Agreement for the Ironwood development (please see Exhibit G <br />in the Planning Commission Staff Report) established a 24% affordable unit <br />requirement for the entire 363-unit project. The applicant built 138 affordable units in its <br />172-unit senior apartment project in the Ironwood development. Because this exceeded <br />the 87 affordable units that were required by 51 units, the City granted the applicant (as <br />allowed by the IZO) 51 Inclusionary Unit Credits that could be used to satisfy the <br />requirements of the IZO on the school option/MDR senior housing site. The 51 <br />Inclusionary Unit Credits will more than meet the affordable housing requirements for <br />this project. Therefore, none of the units in the project need to be affordable and none <br />are proposed. <br />Trail Connections <br />As part of its Ironwood development, Ponderosa Homes installed the Iron Horse Trail <br />between Mohr Avenue and Boulder Street, installed a trail connection between Madsen <br />Court and the Iron Horse Trail, and installed an eight-foot wide paved trail/sidewalk <br />through the development which links Busch Road to the existing trail along the east side <br />of Martin Avenue. An eight-foot wide paved trail/sidewalk was also provided to link the <br />in-tract Busch Road-Martin Avenue trail to the future public school or senior housing <br />development on the 23-acre site. Attachment #9 shows the City approved Ironwood <br />PUD site plan with the in-tract trail highlighted and Attachment #10 shows the existing <br />in-tract trail on an aerial photograph. <br />The City's Community Trails Master Plan shows a future Class C trail adjacent to the <br />northern boundary of the subject site (Attachment #11). This future trail would start <br />near the Mohr Avenue/Irongate Court intersection and head east within the City owned <br />old Mohr Avenue right of way to provide access to the future uses in the East <br />Pleasanton Specific Plan, including the recreation uses that will be established around <br />the old quarry pits. The trail is currently not listed in the City's Capital Improvement <br />Program (CIP) and it is unknown when the trail would be installed, although this trail and <br />other future trails located in East Pleasanton will be further addressed as part of the <br />East Pleasanton Specific Plan. Prior to the Planning Commission hearing, staff had <br />discussions with the applicant about providing a direct trail connection from the <br />proposed development to the future trail (e.g., create a narrow, approximately 12-foot <br />wide homeowner's association-owned parcel with trail between Lots 36 and 37). <br />Ponderosa Homes indicated that it did not wish to provide a second trail connection <br />because they felt the existing in-tract trail from Reimers Drive to Mohr Avenue would <br />provide adequate access to the future trail from this development. The applicant also <br />cited security concerns about providing the direct trail connection. <br />Page 8 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.