Laserfiche WebLink
ground lease is acceptable, staff will begin the PUD process for the ice skating facility. <br />A development agreement and a sales and purchase agreement related to the five acre <br />neighborhood park will be presented to the Council following approval of the Fremont <br />Land PUD. Project annexation will occur after approval of the Hendrick Mercedes Benz, <br />CLC and Fremont Land PUD's and approval of the development agreement. <br />As can be expected, a project of this magnitude will undoubtedly result in continued <br />"twists and turns' that may require modification and amendments. However, the <br />planning documents presented meet the overall intent of the MOU and reflect the <br />community meetings that have been held to date. <br />RELATED MATTER -Stoneridge Drive <br />In recognition of potential issues related to the extension of Stoneridge Drive, the MOU <br />was drafted to indicate that Stoneridge Drive would not be fully extended with the <br />project. Rather, as noted earlier, the MOU indicates that Stoneridge Drive would cul-de- <br />sac just east of a new bridge planned for the Arroyo Mocho. An emergency vehicle <br />access (EVA) would be constructed for emergency purposes (and perhaps, at a later <br />time, for bus traffic if requested by Wheels and approved by the City) from this cul-de- <br />sac to the western edge of a new road (currently called Auto Mall Place) that would <br />connect to EI Charro Road (Attachment 13). In addition, the MOU requires the <br />reservation of adequate right-of-way between the new terminus of Stoneridge Drive and <br />Auto Mall Place to accommodate a full extension of Stoneridge Drive should it be <br />approved at some future time. <br />In addition to the MOU, the City entered into two separate agreements with the City of <br />Livermore, ACSPA and Vulcan Materials (Vulcan operates the quarries to the south of <br />the project) that outline improvements and funding to EI Charro Road and other project <br />related infrastructure needs. Also, shortly after the start of the planning/environmental <br />review process for Staples Ranch, a resident group circulated initiative petitions <br />concerning the development of the site. That effort was opposed by a different resident <br />group. In attempt to address all concerns, in November 2007, both groups presented <br />the City Council with a Joint Statement that set forth a planning process, focusing <br />particularly on the design and development of the 17-acre Community Park, based on <br />the principles set forth in the MOU. As an outcome of the Joint Statement, the City <br />conducted a park master plan process that resulted in adoption of the Staples Ranch <br />Community Park Master Plan. This Joint Statement (Attachment 14) has also guided <br />the development of the attached planning documents. <br />Notwithstanding the above, as has been the case since the start of the Staples Ranch <br />development, the status of the extension of Stoneridge Drive continues to generate <br />considerable interest, both pro and con. As an example, over the past few months, the <br />ACSPA, through Supervisor Scott Haggerty, has encouraged the City to approve the full <br />four lane extension of Stoneridge Drive as part of the initial approval of the Staples <br />Ranch project. To that end, Supervisor Haggerty has recently stated that he would <br />recommend the ACSPA pay for construction of the second bridge over the Arroyo <br />Mocho, the full extension of Stoneridge Drive and up to $1 million in offsite traffic <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />