My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
11 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
020309
>
11 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/27/2009 3:44:34 PM
Creation date
1/27/2009 3:27:02 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/3/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
11 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Fox continued that she would like to have the E occupancy in place <br />because State law puts that requirement in place to protect children in numbers of that <br />magnitude. She noted that skirting the regulations is not in conformance with the <br />California Building Code and that she would not support the facility remaining in <br />B occupancy just because it might be financially restrictive. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that she did not feel the Commission was skirting State <br />law, but rather, the Commission is honoring the State exemption in place while adding <br />further protections, which is the Commission's right to do for businesses in Pleasanton <br />and for the community. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if additional conditions to the application were to be in <br />effect prior to operation of the business in the new building. Ms. Decker replied that <br />would be the case. With respect to ensuring that the occupancy or tenancy in the area <br />meets the Code, she noted that Condition No. 15 requires that the applicant contact the <br />Building and Safety Division and the Fire Marshal prior to the issuance of a business <br />license to ensure the proposed use of the tenant space. <br />Chair Blank noted that the applicant had that she had contacted and met with the fire <br />and building officials, who inspected the sprinklers and emergency exits and deemed <br />them appropriate for the use. <br />With respect to the comments made by Commissioner Narum, Ms. Decker stated that <br />those conditions could be added; however, she recommended that the Commission <br />reconsider the requirement for an outdoor play area as there is no real accessible play <br />area on the site other than the parking area, and the adjacent structure and use has <br />numerous truck deliveries on site. She noted that staff has not evaluated this and <br />recommended that if the application were conditioned to require an outdoor play area, <br />the Commission also provide the flexibility to have the Director of Community <br />Development review and make the final determination to ensure the safety of the <br />children. <br />Chair Blank stated that the program does not seem like the kind of school where the <br />children are in romper room all day but has structured timeframes where the children go <br />from one class to another. He noted that in this sense, he felt an outdoor play area <br />would not be as critical. <br />Commissioner Pearce inquired if the conditions would be crafted such that they would <br />need to be complied with prior to the issuance of a business license or some other <br />event. Ms. Decker replied that the Commission could condition them prior to occupancy <br />or obtaining a business license. She noted that as stated by the applicant, the Fire <br />Department has visited the facility, and the facility is currently ready to be occupied. <br />She added that the applicant would need to contact the Building and Safety Division <br />prior to occupancy and would require a business license. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 10, 2008 Page 18 of 21 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.