Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT4 <br />PCUP-224. Little Ivy League School <br />Application for a conditional use permit to operate a tutorial school with a <br />maximum of 90 students located at 5925 West Las Positas Boulevard, Suite 200. <br />Zoning for the property is PUD-I/C-O (Planned Unit Development- <br />Industrial/Commercial-Office) District. <br />Ms. Jenny Soo presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key <br />elements of the project. <br />Commissioner Fox referred to an a-mail from staff, dated December 10, 2008, with <br />additional attached a-mails included in the packet and that refer to a facility at <br />4455 Stoneridge Drive. She inquired what the relation of the facility was to the facility <br />under consideration. Ms. Soo replied that Little Ivy League is currently located at <br />4455 Stoneridge Drive and that the applicant wishes to relocate to 5925 Las Positas <br />Boulevard. <br />Commissioner Fox referred to the State's letter of exemption and noted that it does not <br />indicate whether the exemption is for an academic school, classroom, or private <br />recreational facility and under what statute the exemption was being granted. <br />Ms. Soo clarified that the exemption restricts the facility from operating for more than <br />16 hours; the children cannot enroll in more than one, 12-week session and, therefore, <br />they must re-enroll in the program every 12 weeks. She noted that the applicant agrees <br />with the exemption requirement and will abide by it. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether or not the exemption was actually for the <br />classification of a classroom or for private recreation use. Ms. Decker replied that, as <br />noted in Section 101158 of Title 22, this is the same exemption that is used for both <br />recreational and tutoring centers. She explained that there are two conditions under <br />which a program can operate for less than 16 hours and that what the Commission <br />typically has engaged in is a discussion of a limitation of 16 hours per child per facility to <br />meet the exemption. She continued that the same exemption allows a child to attend <br />more than 15 hours per week that is not longer than 12 weeks in duration, which is <br />treated as a back-to-back enrollment. She added that each project is considered on a <br />case-by-case basis and that this project was evaluated based on the assessment and <br />evaluation of Ms. Suzanne Bothwell of Community Care Licensing Office. She noted <br />that the applicant will be able to operate within these constraints, primarily the second <br />portion of it being that the program is greater than 15 hours per week and that the <br />applicant is not desirous of limiting the attendance of children to 16 hours per week. <br />Chair Blank inquired if there is a re-enrollment process or paper trail such that the <br />student receives a completion certificate and paperwork at the end of each session that <br />goes on for 12 weeks to show that the student is not continuing in the program for <br />52 weeks. Ms. Decker replied that this particular program would be monitored by the <br />State and the City has not been engaged in the process of looking at re-enrollment for <br />12-week back-to-back sessions. <br />EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, December 10, 2008 Page 1 of 21 <br />