Laserfiche WebLink
Proposed Constitutional Amendment: "Jarvis 'Save 13' Amendment" <br /> <br /> An initiative constitutional amendment commonly referred to as "jarvis <br />'Save 13' Amendment" ("the Amendment") which would amend Article XIIIA <br />(adopted in 1978 and commonly referred to as "Proposition 13" or the <br />"Jarvis-Gann Initiative") will probably qualify for and be submitted to the <br />voters at the statewide general election in November 1984. If enacted by the <br />voters, the effective date of the Amendment purports to be retroactive to <br />August 15, 1983. <br /> <br /> It is believed that, if judicially challenged, the purported retroactivity <br />of the Amendment would be held by a court to be not constitutionally <br />applicable to the assessments securing repayment of the Bonds. If, however, a <br />court should hold the Amendment to be so applicable, the City is further of <br />the opinion that the provisions of the Amendment will not impair the validity <br />and enforceability of the assessments and the Bonds. <br /> <br /> Finally, if for any cause the assessments are declared to be invalid or <br />unforceable by a court, the City is empowered to conduct reassessment <br />proceedings directed to relevying such assessments in accordance with <br />applicable law. <br /> <br />LEGAL OPINION <br /> <br /> All proceedings in connection with the issuance of the Bonds are subject <br />to the approval of Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell & Sperry, Emeryville, California, <br />Bond Counsel for the City of Pleasanton in connection with the Assessment <br />District Project The opinion of Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell & Sperry approving <br />the validity of the Bonds will be printed on each bond. The opinion of Bond <br />Counsel will be qualified as to the enforcability of certain of the <br />proceedings by limitations imposed by bankruptcy, insolvency, moratoria and <br />other similar laws affecting creditors' rights, heretofore or hereafter <br />enacted and by the exercise of judicial discretion in accordance with general <br />principles of equity. Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell & Sperry has been retained by <br />the City as Bond Counsel on a contingent fee, payable solely from the proceeds <br />of the Bond issue. <br /> <br />TAX EXEMPTION <br /> <br /> In the opinion of Sturgis, Ness, Brunsell & Sperry, Emeryville, <br />California, Bond Counsel, interest on the Bonds is exempt from all present <br />Federal income taxes and from State of California personal income taxes under <br />existing statutes, regulations and court decisions and the bonds are exempt <br />from all California taxes except franchise taxes. Interest however, may <br />become federally taxable upon any Bond during any period in which the Bond is <br />held or owned by a substantial user of the facilities financed by the Bond <br />proceeds, or by a related person, within the meaning of Section 103(b) of the <br />Internal Revenue Code. <br /> <br />-37- <br /> <br /> <br />