01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Councilmember McGovern said she read the previous minutes. The idea then was that this would be a pioneer cemetery and noted the costs of irrigation were shocking. She felt it was important to include a financing plan that includes the maintenance so it does not pull from the General Fund. When a plot is sold, the cost should go into a fund where the portion of the interest should be used to maintain it. She asked if private cemeteries were contacted to determine what their plots sell for, and Mr. Wolfe said they worked through CFCS to arrive at the numbers and that staff could return with cost comparisons, however, he believed the proposed costs were reasonable, given the market. Regarding maintenance, staff tried to come up with a mechanism that if irrigation is desired, there would be funds available for it. Councilmember McGovern said in the minutes, it reflected that 15% of the plot fee would go towards maintenance of the facility, which has been removed. She said in making the decision to irrigate in 2015, the idea is to have ongoing maintenance that would not draw from the General Fund. She said if all 200 plots could be sold within one year, she questioned if the City was allocating a number of plots or selling them at one time. Mr. Wolfe said staff has indicated a conservative approach; they could be sold quickly or take longer, but he has heard it would be a short amount of time. Once this occurs, additional revenues would be in place and staff could present a cost for irrigation for Council review. Councilmember McGovern said she would like staff to look at the amount of money that could be raised selling the plots and niches and consider creating an Enterprise Fund. City Manager Fialho suggested that this be put into the motion and staff would build into the fee a percentage for future maintenance, recognizing the fact that this is not endowment. The money would run out at some point, but it would provide a 10-15 year window to offset or subsidize the cost of maintenance. Councilmember McGovern noted there are trees, monuments, creeks, and other things, and she felt that if not planned well, maintenance would be a huge liability. Lastly, she said in Exhibit 5, there is a letter from Catholic Cemeteries dated June 15, 2006 and it talks about 30% of burial rights would go to the church. She asked what the agreement has been to pay for handling the burial services. Mr. Wolfe said the City received funding from the Odd Fellows and when burials occur, the City is billed by CFCS for those burial costs. City Manager Fialho said generally they are about $2,000 per burial. For those who had already purchased plots, that contract dealt with those situations, but the pro forma in Section 2, the City will collect $96,000 from burials and 15% of that money would be going to the Catholic Foundation to assist with services. Mr. Wolfe said the 15% is for marketing and selling of the plots for the City. CFCS would handle all paperwork, help someone select a plot and individuals are actually paying in advance for those services as part of the fee. Councilmember McGovern referred to page 4 of the staff report; burial plots and said the City is paying to the church $750 for burial fees from the $6,900 cost. Mr. Wolfe said the cost of the full size plot and double depth vault monies are all collected and held by CFCS, which he said still needs to be worked out. Councilmember McGovern felt these monies could be held and set up in an enterprise fund. City Manager Fialho suggested that the motion include a funding formula that either is part of the $6,900 or adds to it that creates a revenue stream that the City could collect over time for maintenance. Councilmember McGovern questioned how much of the burial amount comes to the City, and Mr. Wolfe replied $3,400 is the cost of placing the vaults in the ground and $750 is the actual burial cost. City Council Minutes Page 11 of 15 December 16, 2008