My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2009
>
010609
>
03 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/22/2008 3:18:53 PM
Creation date
12/22/2008 3:04:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
1/6/2009
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
03 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
78
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DRAFT <br />Chair Blank inquired if the letter would be the notice of revocation or actual revocation, <br />as the Commission has had situations like this in the past where there have been <br />egregious Code violations and the Commission has had to go through this process. <br />Ms. Decker replied that it depends greatly upon how the condition is crafted. She <br />explained that if the condition is craft where this approval shall expire seven months <br />from the date of approval unless childcare license is applied for and obtained, then this <br />conditional use permit automatically sunsets and expires, and no Code enforcement <br />would be necessary; the business owner would be contacted, and staff would indicate <br />that his conditional use permit has expired. <br />Chair Blank suggested using Mr. Dolan's verbiage that "Within seven months of <br />approval, Tri-Valley Martial Arts shall obtain a childcare license from the State <br />Department of Social Services. If the childcare license is not obtained and business is <br />continued under the rest of the conditions of approval, the City could revoke the <br />conditional use permit on the basis that the applicant did not obtain the childcare <br />license." <br />Commissioner Fox inquired whether the applicant would have to be operating under the <br />State-mandated ratios for children and teachers and screening provisions during the <br />temporary timeframe or if he would be allowed to be the only instructor there. <br />Ms. Decker replied that what staff has been talking about is allowing business to <br />operate with limited hours for the number of children. She stated that the City does not <br />require background checks for those recreation and skills training program instructors. <br />Commissioner Fox inquired if it is the City's Code enforcement responsibility to ensure <br />the health and safety is maintained during that six month timeframe if the State is not <br />monitoring the facility. Ms. Decker said yes. <br />Commissioner O'Connor noted that it is not just hours of operation but other activities as <br />well. He inquired if the Commission should craft a condition during the temporary time <br />that the facility would not engage in some other activities such as transporting and <br />childcare-like activities. <br />Ms. Decker replied that the Commission can certainly add that but that there are <br />numerous tutoring facilities that have skills training and educational forums for children <br />that have vans picking up children and engaging in other activitie's besides tutoring. <br />She noted that what Mr. Pfund has placed in his narrative is that he will be picking up <br />children and bringing them to the facility, which complies with the requirement for <br />children being signed-in and signed-out. <br />Commissioner Narum stated that her expectation is that Mr. Pfund will operate in good <br />faith as if he has a daycare license with employees, record-keeping, etc, limiting the <br />number of hours a child can be there to 16. She indicated that she is willing to support <br />DRAFT EXCERPTS: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/12/2008 Page 23 of 25 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.