My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
RES 84055
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
RESOLUTIONS
>
1980-1989
>
1984
>
RES 84055
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/3/2012 12:24:25 PM
Creation date
12/30/1999 7:02:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
RESOLUTIONS
DOCUMENT DATE
2/14/1984
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 80-74 <br /> <br /> A RESOLUTION APPROVING COUNTY-WIDE METHOD FOR <br /> REDISTRIBUTION OF PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FOLLOWING <br /> ANNEXATION OR CERTAIN OTHER JURISDICTIONAL CHANGES. <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, Section 99 of the Revenue and Taxation Code {AB-8} <br /> provides, among other things, that no local agency <br /> jurisdictional change (other than a city incorporation <br /> or a formation of a district} can be completed without~ <br /> the agencies affected by such change first having agreed <br /> upon a redistribution of property tax revenue from <br /> such area between and among said agencies; and <br /> <br /> WHEREAS, the Alameda County ~ayors"Conference!on March 12, 1980, <br /> reviewed and endorsed as equitable a policy proposal <br /> submitted by the Alameda County Administrator which, <br /> in pertinent part, calls for a redistribution of pro- <br /> perty tax revenues currently derived from an unincorpo- <br /> rated territory which is proposed to be annexed to a <br /> city, <br /> in the following manner: <br /> <br /> 1. In all annexations involving developed or developing' <br /> residential territory,'as well as mixed resident£al/. <br /> ~ con~erci~l areas and vacant or underdeveloped in- <br /> dustrially zoned areas, the City would automatically <br /> be entitled to receive an allocation of the County's <br /> general fund computed property tax revenue from that <br /> area equal to the City's/County existing allocation <br /> percentage ratio within its corporate limits; <br /> <br /> 2. Should a substantial portion of any annexation include <br /> a developed commercial area, the County will under- <br /> take an analysis of nonproperty tax revenues vs. <br /> County service costs in determining what portion, if <br /> any, of the. County allocation is redistributed; and <br /> <br /> 3. In 'the event-that a City assumes full responsibility <br /> for a service or services presentlylprovided by a <br /> separate County taxing agency or special.district within <br /> a territory proposed to be annexed, pursuant to Revenue <br /> and Taxation Code Sec..99'(b), the County will endeavor <br /> to transfer to the City the entire computed property <br /> tax revenue presently allocated to ~uch County. agency <br /> or district from said area. <br /> <br />i, 1I/ '.--. <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.