Laserfiche WebLink
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br /> <br /> ALAMEDA COUNTY, CALIFORNIA <br /> <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 84-40 <br /> <br /> A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON URGING <br /> REFORM OF THE "JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY RULE" <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the City of Pleasanton is finding it increasingly <br /> difficult to maintain basic levels of public service <br /> with dwindling revenues and increased demands for <br /> service from the public; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, the cost of procuring liability insurance and the <br /> cost of defending tort claims is rising dramatically, <br /> placing a severe strain on the budget of this city; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, one of the main reasons for the increasing cost of <br /> liability insurance and tort defense is the California <br /> rule of "joint and several liability," which allows <br /> a plaintiff to recover 100% of a judgment from a <br /> defendant who may be only slightly negligent or resDon- <br /> sib!e for the damages suffered; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, because of this rule, cities are becoming "target <br /> defendants" in every serious injury case, because <br /> some allegation can almost always be made that public <br /> streets were maintained or designed in a defective or <br /> unsafe manner; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, cities have been forced to offer settlements in lawsuits <br /> where they have very little liability, in order to <br /> avoid the risk of a jury awarding a catastrophic <br /> judgment against them; and <br /> <br />WHEREAS, reform of the "joint and several liability rule" is <br /> desperately needed to resolve the mushrooming financial <br /> threat that it poses to cities and their insurers; <br /> <br />NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF PLEASANTON <br />RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: <br /> <br />Section 1: The City Council of the City of Pleasanton urges <br /> immediate and effective reform of the ".~oint and several <br /> liability rule" by any of the following methods: <br /> <br /> 1. An amendment to the rule so that a defendant <br /> would pay for damages only in proportion to its <br /> negligence. <br /> <br /> 2. An amendment to the rule so that cities, counties <br /> and special districts would pay actual sDecial <br /> damages, and a percentage of general damages in <br /> relation to their percentage degree of neSligence. <br /> <br /> <br />