18 - Laserfiche WebLink

Staff did not find this alternative supportable as: 1) the proposed 18 -inch diameter pole would be out of proportion than a normal flag pole and would attract attention to itself, and 2) the underground vault would result in the removal of some existing landscaping along Stanley Boulevard. The applicant has considered two other locations for as the wireless site. However, neither location was found to be superior to the proposed McDonald site for the following reasons: the coverage would be less than 70% when compared to the McDonald's site; and, o neither sites would be able to carry the capacity which the McDonald site is capable to (i.e. the tower design is able to house eight antennas while the stealth monopole may only be able to carry three antennas). Alternative Sites Considered Alternatives for the Planning Commission to consider are to: 1. Deny the Zoning Administrator's approval, and direct the applicant to locate the wireless facility to a less visible location; 2. Uphold the Zoning Administrator's approval of PDRW -6, thereby deny Case No. PAP -126. The Planning Commission may choose to modify the conditions of approval of the Zoning Administrator's approval if it wishes; 3. Allow the existing flagpole to be modified and underground vault be constructed to serve as a telecommunication site. PAP -126 (PDRW -6) Planning Commission Page 5 of 6