My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
17A
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
121608
>
17A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2008 4:57:55 PM
Creation date
12/10/2008 4:57:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
17A
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT2 <br />Explaining the "Triple Flip" <br />The following provides an explanation of the "triple flip". Until 2004-OS the local sales tax rate was 1% <br />and was received monthly (5% of Pleasanton's 1% actually goes to Alameda County under a prior <br />agreement). The State legislature and voters changed the 1% distribution in the 2004-OS fiscal yeaz. <br />During 2004-OS the local sales tax was split with 75% of the 1 % sales tax remaining local and received <br />monthly. The remaining 25% of the sales tax became part of the State legislature's proposal called the <br />"triple flip" and is received in two equal payments in January and May. The `triple flip" swaps one- <br />quarter of the City's 1% local sales tax to secure $15 billion in State deficit financing bonds approved by <br />voters with the passage of Proposition 57 (flip #1). The State is replacing the one-quarter cent with <br />property tax money that has been diverted from cities and counties on a continuing basis since 1992-93 to <br />fulfill school funding obligations (flip #2). Using diverted property tax money previously earmazked for <br />schools requires the State to fulfill their obligation to fund schools from the State's general fund (flip #3). <br />The methodology the State uses to estimate the amount of sales tax loss from the 25% take-a-way to be <br />reimbursed from diverted property tax involves a formula using statewide sales tax growth first, and then <br />second, each city receiving apro-rata shaze of the state-wide growth based on the change in county <br />population. Economic growth in sales tax in individual cities is not a factor in this formula. The amount <br />received using this estimate is compazed with the actual local sales tax collections in any given yeaz to <br />determine the amount of a "true up" payment which is made in the following fiscal yeaz and could be <br />either positive or negative. The formula doesn't take into account the actual sales tax being produced in <br />each jurisdiction and there can be a lag time of up to 18 months before the actual true-up payment is <br />received and the jurisdiction made whole. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.