Laserfiche WebLink
In conversations with Mr. Barnes and others, staff learned that there were t~vo parties who had <br />expressed interest in acquiring the property in the past. An Odd Fellow from Ohio submitted a <br />deposit more than a year ago for 510,000 toward acyuiring the Cemetery. However, the offer <br />was withdrawn after this party became familiar with the State regulations that would apply to the <br />purchase. In addition, a Pleasanton resident has reportedly expressed interest in the site but <br />would prefer the City to acquire it and so is neither publicly nor actively pursuing the purchase at <br />this time. <br />Cemetery Capacity in the Tri-Valley Area <br />The Pleasanton Pioneer Cemetery's interests include continuing plot sales at the Cemetery in <br />part because it believes that the Tri-Valley area lacks local cemetery capacity. However, if true, <br />the problem may be remedied as a result of activities underway outside of Pleasanton, including <br />two serious proposals to develop new large cemeteries in the East Bay. A 58.7-acre cemetery <br />located north of Pleasanton in Tassajara Valley has been proposed and is pending with Contra <br />Costa County. The second proposal is a 40-acre cemetery included as part of a 110-acre project <br />in north Livermore called the Vineyard Memorial Cemetery. The Vineyard Memorial Cemetery <br />project is progressing through the local agency approval process. <br />CITY OWNERSHIP <br />Under current ownership and without a substantial financial investment in the site, the Cemetery <br />appearance is unlikely to improve and infrastructure will continue to deteriorate. Assuming new <br />ownership and/or revenues will not address this situation, the Council could choose to acquire the <br />Cemetery. Staff has identified three possible avenues for City ownership as follows: <br />^ Ownership Alternative #1: The City owns the Cemetery but leases its operations to a <br />private cemetery operator. While this alternative has many possible scenarios, the most <br />practical assumes the City would make required capital improvements to the site and <br />market it to a private operator. With these improvements and the elimination of the need <br />for the State required pre-funded endowment, the City may be able to attract an operator <br />responsible for all aspects of cemetery operations including expanding capacity. <br />^ Ownership Alternative #2: City owns and maintains the Cemetery grounds and <br />partners with the Catholic Funeral & Cemetery Services (CFCs) for funeral, burial and <br />cremation services. Approximately 200 grave and/or cremation plots have been sold and <br />are unfilled. Most of these 200 sales were just for the plot and did not include services <br />with some exceptionsZ. Acquisition would require the City to honor the commitments to <br />the buyers' families and we would need assistance with meeting these commitments as <br />well as complying with recordkeeping and other requirements. <br />' As estimated $I 1,000 in "pre-need" sales have betn made where the purchaser paid for plot and services in advance. <br />SR 06:203 <br />Page 6 <br />