My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
121608
>
16 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/16/2009 11:48:58 AM
Creation date
12/10/2008 4:55:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
16 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CURRENT SITUATION <br />Revenues & Expenses <br />The cemetery is a modest operation. The cemetery's financial statements from 2003, 2004 and <br />2005 show total expenses have run between $20,000 and $26,000 per year. In 2003 and 2004, <br />revenues averaged about $24,000 per year. In 2005, revenues from plot sales substantially <br />increased to over $61,000 and it is likely to be even higher for 2006 based on the number of <br />contracts executed. In 2005 there were 42 contracts; as of August 2006 there are already 62. <br />Any excess revenue each year has been deposited into a "Cemetery Material Care Fund" that as <br />of August 2006 had a balance of about $45,700. This fund appears to be relatively new and as <br />such, it has not been available for required improvements. <br />Physical Condition of Cemetery <br />In general, the Cemetery is in poor condition and generally reflective of an underfunded <br />operation. To evaluate its condition, staff conducted an assessment of various elements of the <br />site including landscaping, safety hazards, pavement, sidewalk/walkways, fencing and <br />streetscape, and structure removal. Brief summaries are provided below and photos of the <br />Cemetery are included as Exhibit 2. <br />^ Turf and Ground Cover. Site turf is in poor condition and in its current state it is not cost <br />effective to maintain. The site does not contain a cost efficient water in-igation system and the <br />current system is manually operated with sprinkler heads that are not of commercial quality, and <br />are positioned on the site in a haphazard fashion. The result is a system that is labor intensive to <br />operate and maintain, wastes a significant amount of water and does not permit a uniform <br />application of water. In addition, the location and size of most grave markers create small <br />irregularly shaped turf areas, which are cost inefficient to mow and trim. <br />The site also contains a large amount of debris and trash that should be removed. Many plot <br />areas have been "improved" with the addition of decorative elements such as small fences, <br />gravel/rocks, planted flowers, edging, small trees, benches, etc. The presence of these items <br />require additional maintenance time [o remove and replace in order to mow turf, remove leaves <br />and debris, and perform other maintenance as needed. <br />• Tree Pruning. The site contains several large Eucalyptus trees that require pruning at a cost <br />of $4,000-$6,000 each. In addition, all trees on the site need a safety inspection and most likely, <br />pruning. <br />• Paving and Sidewalk Repairs. 1'he roadways have deteriorated and need to be repaved. <br />(Sce Exhibit 3 for illustrative photos.) Also, some existing graves have unreinforced concrete <br />slabs over the top of them that have cracked and are collapsing into the graves themselves. In <br />these areas, the use of heavy equipment for paving may cause additional damage to adjacent <br />curbing and concrete. <br />• Fencing and streetscape. "I~he historical decorative fencing and arch are weathered and <br />overgrown with vegetation. <br />SR 06:203 <br />Page 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.