09 - Laserfiche WebLink

confidence that the public interest in active viticulture and preservation of open space will be protected and preserved when considering these development applications. The Tri-Valley Conservancy's staff, board, and other volunteers also undertake regular annual compliance monitoring of both the boundaries of the easement azeas (looking for any encroachments, failure to adhere to plans, etc.). Awell-documented report is then sent to the City, and any needed actions highlighted. In addition, if encroachments or other violations are noted by Tri-Valley Conservancy staff, board members, or volunteers at other times outside of the annual compliance monitoring, this information is immediately conveyed to the City for appropriate enforcement action. As many of the Tri-Valley Conservancy board members and volunteers aze from the local Pleasanton area, and well-informed from their work with the Conservancy about the specifics of the easements, they are regulazly able to keep track of compliance with easement conditions. This demonstrates a responsibility by Tri-Valley Conservancy members which reaches beyond their regular scheduled duties, and provides an important on-going public benefit. For the Vineyard Avenue Corridor Specific Plan area, the Tri-Valley Conservancy has had a vital role in ensuring the planting of acres of new vineyazds, and related preservation of agricultural conservation easements, as well as open space easements. This has protected the public's interest, as expressed in the City's Specific Plan, as well as the Tri-Valley Conservancy's own mission statement. Protection of the Public Interest through Easement Monitoring. Since 1999, the City of Pleasanton has contracted with the Tri-Valley Conservancy to provide easement monitoring at a complex project in eastern Pleasanton known as Ruby Hills. This development has hundreds of homes, commercial uses, a fire station and a golf course, but also includes significant habitat for the California Tiger Salamander. The Tri-Valley Conservancy worked collaboratively with the City when the open space and habitat easements were established, as the Conservancy actively reviewed the boundary surveys and other markers used to establish the easement areas. The Tri-Valley Conservancy has carried out regulaz annual encroachment monitoring visits, and deliver to the City well-documented reports. When resource agency staff, such as a deputy from the Califomia Department of Fish & Game, have been at the Ruby Hill site for that agency's own monitoring of the California Tiger Salamander habitat, the Tri-Valley Conservancy sent its own monitors to walk-along with the Fish & Game deputy, City staff, and developer's agents, to understand the habitat and the special status species. While the Tri-Valley Conservancy is paid annually by the City for these encroachment monitoring reports, this relationship has not impacted the Conservancy's candor in its findings. For example, when the Tri-Valley Conservancy made its visit to Ruby Hill after hearing the concerns from the Fish & Game deputy, the Conservancy report prominently noted that one of the deputy's recommendations had not been completed on a portion of the habitat in the control of the City. When the City's remedial action was further delayed, due to a miscommunication among City staff about responsibility for this situation as between the City and the developer, the