My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15 ATTACHMENTS
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2008
>
121608
>
15 ATTACHMENTS
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/10/2008 4:39:00 PM
Creation date
12/10/2008 4:29:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
STAFF REPORTS
DOCUMENT DATE
12/16/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
15 Y
DOCUMENT NO
15 ATTACHMENTS
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
56
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Assisted living units have large central kitchens or kitchenettes and not <br />;~r~N FULL/Complkitchens and would not be counted against the housing cap. <br />We agree with the staff report (pg 8) and I quote "It would appeaz that a road, <br />such as the Bypass Road, that is intended to serve existing development could be <br />built on slopes greater than 25% in that the grading for the road would not be for <br />the purpose of constructing new residential or commercial structures." <br />We agree with Interpretation #1 regarding subdivision of a legal pazcel. (pg. 19) <br />Finally, we agree with the staffreport conclusion and I quote (pg. 39) "The Save <br />Pleasanton's Hills and Housing Cap initiative has highlighted longstanding <br />community dedication to regulating hillside development, and firmly adhering to <br />the housing cap and growth management. ... the initiative has been a catalyst for <br />the expected update of hillside development regulations and grading ordinance to <br />reaffirm City goals for open space and view protection, as well as sensitive, <br />planned housing development." <br />We appreciate the City Staffs efforts to identify all the issues related to the <br />initiative. We believe that this statement of intent clarifies the majority of the <br />issues that some people believed to be "ambiguous". Based on these <br />clazifications, there is no need for the Council to place any sort of complimentary <br />or competing measure on the ballot. We ask that the initiative stand on its own in <br />November to allow the people of Pleasanton make this decision. <br />1~fY~U~- ~/ZO~n~ <br />~3z~ ;~-e~ edc~ <br />~C~as~~~ <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.