15 - Laserfiche WebLink

of Measure PP coming into effect if both measures had passed and Measure OQ had received more votes. Measure PP, on the other hand, did not have similar language about conflict and nullification as to any other measure. In that both measures passed a guiding rule of statutory interpretation is that two laws be read together and construed to give effect to both. Thus, the substantive provisions of the measures are analyzed to determine if any actual conflict exists. DISCUSSION Hill Side Development Regulations. Measure PP adopts and Measure OQ reaffirms specific policies for the General Plan regarding hillside development restrictions. Measure PP prohibits placing housing units or structures on slopes of 25% or greater, or within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline, does not allow grading to construct residential or commercial structures in those same areas, and also bans subdividing a 'legal parcel' (as of January 1, 2007) for more than 10 housing units, but exempts developments of 10 or fewer housing units from these restrictions. Some of the terms used by Measure PP, such as "slope", "structure" and "ridgeline", are not specifically defined in the measure, but are broadly used in the existing General Plan. Additionally, Measure PP's language restricting subdivisions could be interpreted in several ways. These implementation considerations were discussed in the Analysis of the Impacts and Effects of the Save Pleasanton's Hills & Housing Cap Initiative, dated June 11, 2008, and presented to the City Council on June 26, 2008 (the "Analysis Report") as an informational report.2 In contrast to Measure PP's specific restrictions, Measure QQ's substantive hillside policies involve the readoption and reaffirmation of existing policies and a program from the 1996 General Plan to generally: (i) preserve scenic hillside and ridge views of the Pleasanton, Main and Southeast Hills; (ii) study the feasibility of preserving large open space areas in the Southeast Hills; and (iii) protect all large contiguous areas of Open Space. These Measure PP and QQ General Plan policies and program exist as written without any direct conflict. Potential conflicts could arise when a specific project is considered. For example, an applicant may claim it qualifies for the exemption from Measure PP's restriction on development within 100 vertical feet of a ridgeline because the project proposes fewer than 10 housing units; but the Measure QQ policy, which provides for the preservation of ridge views, could be interpreted as prohibiting such development. Therefore, while a conflict may arise when a particular application is considered, since there is no direct conflict between the substantive Measures PP and QQ hillside s The City Council did not adopt this Analysis Report, so it is not controlling when Measure PP's restrictions are applied to specific development projects. Page 3 of 7