My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 102208 Special Mtg
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2000-2009
>
2008
>
PC 102208 Special Mtg
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/5/2017 4:38:21 PM
Creation date
11/26/2008 3:34:12 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
10/22/2008
DESTRUCT DATE
PERMANENT
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Mall Place; a new two-lane bridge would extend Stoneridge Drive over the Arroyo <br />Mocho and provide access to the proposed senior continuing care community and <br />parks; and no through-connection from Stoneridge Drive to Auto Mall Place and EI <br />Charro Road except for emergency vehicles. <br />He presented a depiction of the EVA, showing gates and bollards and separated <br />sidewalks. He noted that the amended Specific Plan also has policies related to <br />both parks. He added that the City Council recently approved a Conceptual Park <br />Master Plan which is primarily for the Community Park but has elements that will be <br />brought into the Neighborhood Park, including the recommendation for an Ice <br />Center; Publics Services and Utilities -water, energy, flood control, storm water; <br />Environmental Impact and Mitigation measures -recognizes the EIR; and <br />implementation -infrastructure phasing, financing public improvements, and <br />developer/Alameda County Surplus Property Authority responsibilities. <br />Mr. Bocian then discussed the proposed rezoning and pre-zoning issues, stating <br />that the Continuing Care Retirement facility is being proposed for High Density <br />Residential/Commercial, the Auto Mall as PUD-Commercial, and Retail as <br />PUD-Commercial. He pointed out that the rezoning is currently PUD-Medium <br />Density Residential but is actually part of the CLC property so it would be rezoned to <br />PUD-Commercial. He noted that there is an existing strip of 19 feet which will be <br />transferred to property owners and which will be PUD-Medium Density Residential, <br />which is the current zoning. <br />Mr. Bocian then introduced Mr. Mike Tassano, City Traffic Engineer, and asked the <br />Commissioners if they had any questions. There being none, Mr. Bocian turned the <br />floor over to Mr. Rodney Jeung. <br />Rodney Jeung, PBS&J, noted that the certification action to be taken by the City <br />Council and the recommendation by the Planning Commission are not the same as <br />project approval. He stated that the Commission can find that the EIR satisfies and <br />meets all of the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) <br />and still reject the project. He explained that "certification" means the City has <br />complied with the CEQA and various State guidelines, that the City has received all <br />information necessary to understand the potential impacts associated with approving <br />the project, and that the City has exercised its own independent judgment regarding <br />the analysis of the project. <br />Mr. Jeung noted that after the Draft EIR was released, the planning activities <br />continued, and there were several changes to the project description that was <br />previously presented in the Draft EIR. He stated that these changes involved <br />components related to the emergency access, the conceptual park master plan, <br />boundary modifications, and a revision as to how the EI Charro Road Auto Mall <br />Place intersection would be constructed and configured. He stated that the changes <br />to the project description do not constitute any new environmental effects or things <br />already identified in the EIR; they are normal changes, modifications that evolved <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, October 22, 2008 Page 4 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.